Comparison Overview

Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy

VS

Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama

Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy

A - 232, New Delhi, 110024, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy is an independent think-tank doing legal research to make better laws and improve governance for the public good. We engage with Ministries in the Government of India, State governments, Standing Committees of Parliament, other agencies and instrumentalities of the state, either at Union or State level, advising on proposed legislation and regulation, assist in legislative drafting and provide independent critical analyses of existing law and policy with recommendations for reform.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 166
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama

P.O. Box 293931, Birmingham, AL, US, 35229
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 700 and 749

PARCA is Alabama’s first and only independent research center. PARCA works to inform and improve the decision making of state and local leaders in Alabama through objective research and analysis. PARCA studies state and local finances and taxes, school performance, workforce development, and government operations. -We assess infrastructure, education outcomes, and government and nonprofit performance measures. -We help counties, cities, and schools improve budgeting. -We make recommendations to improve process and performance. -We educate citizens about good policy and good decision making. Our work supports and informs policy makers at all levels, from state-wide elected officials, to Legislators, to city and county officials, to public school administrators, to nonprofit leaders.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/parcalabama.jpeg
Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama in 2025.

Incident History — Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vidhi-centre-for-legal-policy.jpeg
Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/parcalabama.jpeg
Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company.

In the current year, Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama company and Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama company nor Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama company nor Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama company nor Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company nor Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy nor Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company nor Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy company employs more people globally than Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy nor Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy nor Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy nor Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy nor Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy nor Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy nor Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H