Comparison Overview

Videogame History Museum

VS

Musée du Louvre

Videogame History Museum

None
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.vghmuseum.org

The Videogame History Museum was established to document, preserve, and archive the history of the Videogame industry. The museum is the next logical evolution of the world-famous Classic Gaming Expo museum exhibit which is comprised of over 20,000 items spanning numerous collections and over 25 years of historical document and data archiving. The vision of the Videogame History Museum is to have a physical research and reference facility that will also serve as an interactive educational exhibit to the industry and general public alike.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Musée du Louvre

Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75001
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://www.louvre.fr/

Le musée du Louvre a notamment pour mission de conserver, protéger, restaurer et présenter au public les œuvres des collections inscrites sur ses inventaires comprises celles du musée national Eugène-Delacroix et des œuvres déposées dans le jardin des Tuileries ; d’assurer dans ces espaces l’accueil du public le plus large, d’en développer la fréquentation, de favoriser la connaissance des collections, de mettre en œuvre des actions d’éducation et de diffusion visant à assurer l’égal accès de tous à la culture ; d’assurer l’étude scientifique de ses collections ; de concourir à l’éducation, la formation et la recherche dans le domaine de l’histoire de l’art, de l’archéologie et de la muséographie et de gérer un auditorium. Suivez-nous également sur : https://www.facebook.com/museedulouvre/ https://twitter.com/MuseeLouvre https://www.instagram.com/museelouvre/ https://www.youtube.com/user/louvre

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 1,549
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/videogame-history-museum.jpeg
Videogame History Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/musee-du-louvre.jpeg
Musée du Louvre
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Videogame History Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Musée du Louvre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Videogame History Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Musée du Louvre in 2026.

Incident History — Videogame History Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Videogame History Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Musée du Louvre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Musée du Louvre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/videogame-history-museum.jpeg
Videogame History Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/musee-du-louvre.jpeg
Musée du Louvre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Videogame History Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Musée du Louvre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Musée du Louvre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Videogame History Museum company.

In the current year, Musée du Louvre company and Videogame History Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Musée du Louvre company nor Videogame History Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Musée du Louvre company nor Videogame History Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Musée du Louvre company nor Videogame History Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Videogame History Museum company nor Musée du Louvre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Videogame History Museum nor Musée du Louvre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Videogame History Museum company nor Musée du Louvre company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Musée du Louvre company employs more people globally than Videogame History Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Videogame History Museum nor Musée du Louvre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Videogame History Museum nor Musée du Louvre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Videogame History Museum nor Musée du Louvre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Videogame History Museum nor Musée du Louvre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Videogame History Museum nor Musée du Louvre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Videogame History Museum nor Musée du Louvre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References