Comparison Overview

Victoria Law Foundation

VS

Asahi Legal

Victoria Law Foundation

Level 5, 43 Hardware Lane, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Victoria Law Foundation supports better justice through research, education and grants. We are a not-for-profit organisation funded by the Victorian Legal Services Board Public Purpose Fund. Established in 1967, our status as an independent body allows us to play a valuable role in driving and supporting innovative projects, modernising the legal system and promoting best practice across the legal sector.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Asahi Legal

Office 32 B, 2nd Floor, 8/10 Khatau building, Alkesh Dinesh Mody Marg, , Mumbai, 400001, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Asahi Legal is a full-service law firm based in Mumbai, with over 30 years of experience delivering strategic legal solutions to corporates, MSMEs, banks, and individuals. We offer a comprehensive range of services across dispute resolution, real estate, insolvency, banking, corporate law, and regulatory compliance. Our team represents clients before the Supreme Court, High Courts, NCLT/NCLAT, DRTs, Consumer Forums, and RERA. We are especially recognized for our leadership in Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) matters, advising Committees of Creditors, Resolution Professionals, and Liquidators in complex CIRP proceedings across sectors such as real estate, infrastructure, and financial services. In real estate, we have advised on landmark redevelopment projects, including one of Mumbai’s largest society redevelopments, and continue to support developers and housing societies with end-to-end legal counsel. Led by Managing Partner Amit A. Tungare, Asahi Legal combines legal acumen with commercial insight to deliver practical, business-aligned outcomes.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victoria-law-foundation.jpeg
Victoria Law Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Victoria Law Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Asahi Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Victoria Law Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Asahi Legal in 2025.

Incident History — Victoria Law Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Victoria Law Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Asahi Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Asahi Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victoria-law-foundation.jpeg
Victoria Law Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asahi-legal.jpeg
Asahi Legal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Victoria Law Foundation company and Asahi Legal company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Asahi Legal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Victoria Law Foundation company.

In the current year, Asahi Legal company and Victoria Law Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Asahi Legal company nor Victoria Law Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Asahi Legal company nor Victoria Law Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Asahi Legal company nor Victoria Law Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Victoria Law Foundation company nor Asahi Legal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Victoria Law Foundation nor Asahi Legal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Victoria Law Foundation company nor Asahi Legal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Victoria Law Foundation company employs more people globally than Asahi Legal company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Victoria Law Foundation nor Asahi Legal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Victoria Law Foundation nor Asahi Legal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Victoria Law Foundation nor Asahi Legal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Victoria Law Foundation nor Asahi Legal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Victoria Law Foundation nor Asahi Legal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Victoria Law Foundation nor Asahi Legal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X