Comparison Overview

Victor Envelope

VS

Fort Nassau Graphics

Victor Envelope

301 Arthur Ct, Bensenville, Illinois, 60106, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://victorenvelope.com

Victor Envelope Company specializes in production development, manufacturing and distribution. We perfectly blend current print technology, craftsmanship and engineering to ensure your envelopes are done correctly and delivered on time. With over 50 years experience, Victor Envelope has built an excellent reputation that is based on producing the highest quality products with unsurpassed delivery times. Our current capacity allows us to produce more than 1 billion envelopes annually. Under one roof, we produce envelopes of all sizes and styles. We manufacture 24 hours a day to assure that we provide our products when our customers need them: on time.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Fort Nassau Graphics

None
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849
http://www.fortnassaugraphics.net/

Fort Nassau Graphics was founded in 1979 by Brian Francis (son) and Paul Cipilone (son-in-law) of the late master pressman Filmore Francis. We have grown from a small print shop to a full service 20,000 square foot facility located in West Deptford, New Jersey. The family values that Fort Nassau were built on continue to drive the company today. Our dedication to service, attention to quality, and our commitment to meeting our customers deadlines make us one of the most respected print facilities in the region. Fort Nassau has a state of the art prepress department and a Heidelberg pressroom printing one through six colors with Aqueous coating. This, combined with our full service in-house bindery assures that we can complete your job from start to finish, on time, and under one roof. We are dedicated to providing our customers with superior customer service and high quality print and finishing at the best possible price. This philosophy guides us when buying new equipment and upgrading our operating systems. Fort Nassau is also committed to responsible environmental operation. This includes a comprehensive recycling program of all stock and materials used, environmentally friendly inks and coatings, and we are a FSC (Forest Stewardship Concil) certified printer as well.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victor-envelope.jpeg
Victor Envelope
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Fort Nassau Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Victor Envelope
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fort Nassau Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Victor Envelope in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fort Nassau Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — Victor Envelope (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Victor Envelope cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fort Nassau Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fort Nassau Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victor-envelope.jpeg
Victor Envelope
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Fort Nassau Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fort Nassau Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Victor Envelope company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fort Nassau Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Victor Envelope company.

In the current year, Fort Nassau Graphics company and Victor Envelope company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fort Nassau Graphics company nor Victor Envelope company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fort Nassau Graphics company nor Victor Envelope company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fort Nassau Graphics company nor Victor Envelope company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Victor Envelope company nor Fort Nassau Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Victor Envelope nor Fort Nassau Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Victor Envelope company nor Fort Nassau Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Victor Envelope company employs more people globally than Fort Nassau Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Victor Envelope nor Fort Nassau Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Victor Envelope nor Fort Nassau Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Victor Envelope nor Fort Nassau Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Victor Envelope nor Fort Nassau Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Victor Envelope nor Fort Nassau Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Victor Envelope nor Fort Nassau Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References