Comparison Overview

Victor

VS

TMS of the Carolinas

Victor

1360 East Lassen Avenue, Chico, California, 95973, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Victor is comprised of three organizations, Victor Treatment Centers and Victor Community Support Services, which both provide a full continuum of mental health services, and Victor Foster Family and Adoption Agency. Victor employs over 1000 dedicated staff across multiple locations in California, who are committed to the same values and ideals that have been in place from day one. As an organization we have had only three CEO’s in our 65 year history, allowing us to have both stability and continuity with the foundational mission of our organization. With that foundation in place, Victor continues to innovate and create new programs and services to meet the needs while staying true to our mission. Today Victor’s services reach throughout California, helping literally thousands of individuals and families deal with their unique challenges every day and inspiring hope for the future. Today as we celebrate over 65 years of service, Victor provides a wide range of behavioral health, educational, and social support services to children, youth, families and adults throughout California. Services for those in need are individualized, flexible, community-based and strength-based with a continuous commitment to providing excellent support that truly changes the lives of those we serve.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 474
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TMS of the Carolinas

245 Le Phillip Ct NE, Concord, 28025, US
Last Update:

TMS of the Carolinas was formed because we recognized that behavioral therapy and medications were not resolving the problem of severe depression. As the Co-Founders of Genesis A New Beginning Counseling Services, we have seen the significant increase of depression and anxiety. These issues have dramatically increased with the onset of COVID. This realization led us to seek alternative treatment options for Major Depression. This search ended when we were introduced to the NeuroStar Advanced Therapy system, the #1 TMS choice for doctors nationally! We’re proud to provide NeuroStar Advanced TMS Therapy to patients across Concord, Charlotte, and the surrounding area. Philip Nofal, M.D. is the Medical Director at TMS of the Carolinas. Dr. Nofal is a leading psychiatrist in the region and has been serving professionally for 28 years. Dr. Nofal brings over 3 decades of caring psychiatric experience and oversight to TMS of the Carolinas. Teresa Haggard, RN, MSN, FNP-BC is the Nurse Practitioner for TMS of the Carolinas. Teresa is a graduate of the University of Chapel Hill School of Medicine and she brings her vast experience as a Nurse Practitioner to TMS of the Carolinas. We are excited to have Teresa on the medical team at TMS of the Carolinas! Our mission is to provide our patients with: >the latest, safest and most effective solutions available for the treatment of >major depressive disorders >the highest level of psychiatric oversight >the best patient service possible

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victor-community-support.jpeg
Victor
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tms-of-the-carolinas.jpeg
TMS of the Carolinas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Victor
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TMS of the Carolinas
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Victor in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TMS of the Carolinas in 2026.

Incident History — Victor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Victor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TMS of the Carolinas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TMS of the Carolinas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victor-community-support.jpeg
Victor
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tms-of-the-carolinas.jpeg
TMS of the Carolinas
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

TMS of the Carolinas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Victor company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, TMS of the Carolinas company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Victor company.

In the current year, TMS of the Carolinas company and Victor company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TMS of the Carolinas company nor Victor company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TMS of the Carolinas company nor Victor company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TMS of the Carolinas company nor Victor company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Victor company nor TMS of the Carolinas company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Victor nor TMS of the Carolinas holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Victor company nor TMS of the Carolinas company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Victor company employs more people globally than TMS of the Carolinas company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Victor nor TMS of the Carolinas holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Victor nor TMS of the Carolinas holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Victor nor TMS of the Carolinas holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Victor nor TMS of the Carolinas holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Victor nor TMS of the Carolinas holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Victor nor TMS of the Carolinas holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N