Comparison Overview

Vibrant ABA

VS

Albertina Kerr

Vibrant ABA

46 Cook St, None, Brooklyn, New York, US, 11206
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

At Vibrant ABA, our heartfelt mission is to empower underprivileged children on the autism spectrum. These remarkable kids often encounter obstacles when it comes to accessing the resources they need to reach their full potential. That's where Vibrant ABA comes in. Our dedicated team of BCBA’s and Behavioral Therapists is empowered to deliver personalized ABA Therapy to these incredible children and their families throughout the state of New York, with a primary focus on serving Medicaid patients.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Albertina Kerr

424 NE 22nd Ave, Portland, Oregon, 97232, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Albertina Kerr empowers people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD) and mental health challenges to lead self-determined lives in their communities. Established in 1907, Kerr has a long history of providing services and advocacy for those who need it most. As one of the largest and oldest human services providers in the Pacific Northwest, Kerr offers: • Programs and services for children, teens, and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD), including safe, supportive 24-hour residential care and supportive employment services. • Inpatient crisis psychiatric care for youth; children and teens stabilize and gain the skills they need to stay safe, preserve relationships, and are prepared to be successful at home and school.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 491
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vibrant-aba.jpeg
Vibrant ABA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/albertina-kerr-centers.jpeg
Albertina Kerr
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Vibrant ABA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Albertina Kerr
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vibrant ABA in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Albertina Kerr in 2025.

Incident History — Vibrant ABA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vibrant ABA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Albertina Kerr (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Albertina Kerr cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vibrant-aba.jpeg
Vibrant ABA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/albertina-kerr-centers.jpeg
Albertina Kerr
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Albertina Kerr company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Vibrant ABA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Albertina Kerr company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Vibrant ABA company.

In the current year, Albertina Kerr company and Vibrant ABA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Albertina Kerr company nor Vibrant ABA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Albertina Kerr company nor Vibrant ABA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Albertina Kerr company nor Vibrant ABA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Vibrant ABA company nor Albertina Kerr company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Vibrant ABA nor Albertina Kerr holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Vibrant ABA company nor Albertina Kerr company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Albertina Kerr company employs more people globally than Vibrant ABA company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Vibrant ABA nor Albertina Kerr holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Vibrant ABA nor Albertina Kerr holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Vibrant ABA nor Albertina Kerr holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Vibrant ABA nor Albertina Kerr holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Vibrant ABA nor Albertina Kerr holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Vibrant ABA nor Albertina Kerr holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H