Comparison Overview

VEC

VS

Conditon Monitoring Australia

VEC

1441 Rollins Road, Burlingame, California, 94010, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

VEC provides site evaluations, consulting, and engineered solutions for mitigating acoustic, vibration, & magnetic fields for customers with precision instruments. With over four decades of experience, VEC serves electron microscopy, semiconductor manufacturing, research institutions, and national laboratories. VEC continuously invests in cutting-edge technologies and fosters strategic partnerships to expand and optimize our products and services, providing our clients with the answers and information they need to meet project requirements. What makes us different? Reports Our reports are best-in-class, containing an informative and concise interpretation and analysis of the data collected as well as recommendations for the remediation if required. More to Offer Our site surveys are unique in that we offer an evaluation of the disturbances affecting both a single instrument at a particular location and several instruments at various locations. Also, we can identify an isolated source of the disturbance on a client’s microscope or equipment. As a distributor of Daeil Systems and Spicer Consulting, VEC offers the most effective active vibration isolators and EMI cancellation systems. We also offer acoustic abatement solutions and monitoring to be able to cover all the mitigation needs of our customers. Beginning to end project support We will be with you for the duration of the project. First, we conduct a site evaluation to determine the suitability of a location for your equipment. We then customize recommendations to suit your space and needs. Then we install any remediation equipment required. Finally, we will conduct a final site validation to ensure that the location meets your requirements. Collaboration with Project Personnel VEC co-operates with architects and engineers and offers guidance to lab managers to ensure a facility meets the unique requirements of client equipment.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Conditon Monitoring Australia

undefined, undefined, undefined, 2083, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Peace of mind that you are working with a company which has over 22 years of experience in the CM industry and our Quality System is certified to ISO9001-2008 Condition Monitoring is our ONLY business, it's what we do best! CONDITION MONITORING - VIBRATION ANALYSIS - DYNAMIC BALANCING - LASER ALIGNMENT - OIL ANALYSIS CM TRAINING - POST OVERHAUL MACHINE QUALITY TESTING - MOTOR CIRCUIT ANALYSIS - THERMOGRAPHY

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vibeng.jpeg
VEC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conditon-monitoring-australia.jpeg
Conditon Monitoring Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
VEC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Conditon Monitoring Australia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VEC in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Conditon Monitoring Australia in 2025.

Incident History — VEC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VEC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Conditon Monitoring Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conditon Monitoring Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vibeng.jpeg
VEC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conditon-monitoring-australia.jpeg
Conditon Monitoring Australia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both VEC company and Conditon Monitoring Australia company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Conditon Monitoring Australia company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to VEC company.

In the current year, Conditon Monitoring Australia company and VEC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Conditon Monitoring Australia company nor VEC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Conditon Monitoring Australia company nor VEC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Conditon Monitoring Australia company nor VEC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither VEC company nor Conditon Monitoring Australia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither VEC nor Conditon Monitoring Australia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither VEC company nor Conditon Monitoring Australia company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

VEC company employs more people globally than Conditon Monitoring Australia company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither VEC nor Conditon Monitoring Australia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither VEC nor Conditon Monitoring Australia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither VEC nor Conditon Monitoring Australia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither VEC nor Conditon Monitoring Australia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither VEC nor Conditon Monitoring Australia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither VEC nor Conditon Monitoring Australia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H