Comparison Overview

ViaMar Health

VS

NELFT Careers

ViaMar Health

560 Village Blvd, West Palm Beach, Fl, 33409, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

ViaMar Health's mission is to provide comprehensive, compassionate treatment for those individuals and families suffering from eating disorders and co-occurring mental health conditions. We at ViaMar Health believe in a multidisciplinary team approach using best practice, effective evidence-based modalities to ensure the best care possible. At ViaMar, our highest priority is to cultivate an environment where patients and families feel valued, safe and connected with those helping them through their healing process in an partial hospitalization and outpatient setting.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NELFT Careers

CEME, Marsh way , Rainham, Essex, UK, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-21

We are North East London Foundation NHS Foundation Trust. We provide mental health and community services for 4.9 million people living in North East London, Essex, Kent and Medway. We employ 7,500 staff across 200 services and work in hospitals, health centres, GP practices and people’s homes. We know that our staff are our greatest asset, that’s why we prioritise wellbeing support and offer flexible and hybrid working. Career progression, development opportunities, and world class training are all part of the package at NELFT. With a just and compassionate culture at the heart of everything we do, we’re committed to creating an environment where our people feel valued and supported to bring their authentic self to work. If you want to make a difference to people’s lives, join NELFT today.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/viamarhealth.jpeg
ViaMar Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nelft-careers.jpeg
NELFT Careers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ViaMar Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NELFT Careers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ViaMar Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NELFT Careers in 2026.

Incident History — ViaMar Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ViaMar Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NELFT Careers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NELFT Careers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/viamarhealth.jpeg
ViaMar Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nelft-careers.jpeg
NELFT Careers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ViaMar Health company and NELFT Careers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, NELFT Careers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ViaMar Health company.

In the current year, NELFT Careers company and ViaMar Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NELFT Careers company nor ViaMar Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NELFT Careers company nor ViaMar Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NELFT Careers company nor ViaMar Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ViaMar Health company nor NELFT Careers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ViaMar Health nor NELFT Careers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NELFT Careers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ViaMar Health company.

Neither ViaMar Health nor NELFT Careers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ViaMar Health nor NELFT Careers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ViaMar Health nor NELFT Careers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ViaMar Health nor NELFT Careers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ViaMar Health nor NELFT Careers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ViaMar Health nor NELFT Careers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N