Comparison Overview

VF Corporation

VS

Ralph Lauren

VF Corporation

VF Corporation, Denver, CO, US, 80202
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 600 and 649

VF Corporation is one of the world’s largest apparel, footwear and accessories companies connecting people to the lifestyles, activities and experiences they cherish most through a family of iconic outdoor, active and workwear brands including Vans®, The North Face®, Timberland® and Dickies®. Our purpose is to power movements of sustainable and active lifestyles for the betterment of people and our planet. We believe that when you discover the difference between a career and a calling, you get so much more out of life. When those lines begin to blur, you start to limit yourself much less and start aiming for more. That’s what we want for everyone who joins us at VF. And frankly, that’s what it takes to thrive here too. For more information, please visit vfc.com.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 28,984
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Ralph Lauren

650 Madison Ave, New York, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18

Ralph Lauren Corporation (NYSE:RL) is a global leader in the design, marketing and distribution of luxury lifestyle products in five categories: apparel, footwear & accessories, home, fragrances and hospitality. For more than 50 years, Ralph Lauren has sought to inspire the dream of a better life through authenticity and timeless style. Its reputation and distinctive image have been developed across a wide range of products, brands, distribution channels and international markets. The Company’s brand names – which include Ralph Lauren, Ralph Lauren Collection, Ralph Lauren Purple Label, Polo Ralph Lauren, Double RL, Lauren Ralph Lauren, Polo Ralph Lauren Children and Chaps, among others – constitute one of the world’s most widely recognized families of consumer brands.

NAICS: 448
NAICS Definition: Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees: 21,075
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vf-corporation.jpeg
VF Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ralph-lauren.jpeg
Ralph Lauren
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
VF Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ralph Lauren
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VF Corporation in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ralph Lauren in 2026.

Incident History — VF Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VF Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ralph Lauren (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ralph Lauren cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vf-corporation.jpeg
VF Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Motivation: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ralph-lauren.jpeg
Ralph Lauren
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ralph Lauren company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VF Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

VF Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Ralph Lauren company has not reported any.

In the current year, Ralph Lauren company and VF Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ralph Lauren company nor VF Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

VF Corporation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Ralph Lauren company has not reported such incidents publicly.

VF Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Ralph Lauren company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither VF Corporation company nor Ralph Lauren company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither VF Corporation nor Ralph Lauren holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither VF Corporation company nor Ralph Lauren company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

VF Corporation company employs more people globally than Ralph Lauren company, reflecting its scale as a Retail Apparel and Fashion.

Neither VF Corporation nor Ralph Lauren holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither VF Corporation nor Ralph Lauren holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither VF Corporation nor Ralph Lauren holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither VF Corporation nor Ralph Lauren holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither VF Corporation nor Ralph Lauren holds HIPAA certification.

Neither VF Corporation nor Ralph Lauren holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N