Comparison Overview

Veterinary Business Development

VS

Routledge

Veterinary Business Development

Olympus House, Staniland Way, Peterborough, PE4 6NA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vbd.co.uk

Veterinary Business Development is the UK’s leading veterinary communications company. Based in Peterborough, UK, we deliver trusted and independent communications across print and web for the veterinary sector. Our mission is to be the communication partner of choice within the veterinary professions and allied markets, providing innovative solutions for our customers while guaranteeing substantial year-on-year growth and career development for all our staff.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 40
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Routledge

None
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 800 and 849
http://www.taylorandfrancis.com

Taylor & Francis Group engages in publishing and distribution of scientific, academic, and professional journals and books. The company’s publications coveres a range of subjects including: bioscience, business and management, construction, education, engineering, the environment, humanities, medicine and healthcare, physical sciences, psychology, reference and social and political science. As of May 10, 2004, Taylor & Francis Group is a subsidiary of Informa Group plc.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 365
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/veterinary-business-development.jpeg
Veterinary Business Development
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Routledge
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Veterinary Business Development
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Routledge
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Veterinary Business Development in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Routledge in 2025.

Incident History — Veterinary Business Development (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Veterinary Business Development cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Routledge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Routledge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/veterinary-business-development.jpeg
Veterinary Business Development
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Routledge
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Routledge company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Veterinary Business Development company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Routledge company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Veterinary Business Development company.

In the current year, Routledge company and Veterinary Business Development company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Routledge company nor Veterinary Business Development company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Routledge company nor Veterinary Business Development company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Routledge company nor Veterinary Business Development company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Veterinary Business Development company nor Routledge company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Veterinary Business Development nor Routledge holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Veterinary Business Development company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Routledge company.

Routledge company employs more people globally than Veterinary Business Development company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Veterinary Business Development nor Routledge holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Veterinary Business Development nor Routledge holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Veterinary Business Development nor Routledge holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Veterinary Business Development nor Routledge holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Veterinary Business Development nor Routledge holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Veterinary Business Development nor Routledge holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References