Comparison Overview

Vesta, Inc

VS

Davis Behavioral Health, Inc.

Vesta, Inc

9301 Annapolis Rd, Lanham, Maryland, 20706, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vesta.org

Our Company Vesta, Inc. is a private, non-profit, comprehensive behavioral health care organization with six locations throughout Maryland. Vesta offers comprehensive, flexible, and ongoing services for adults, children and adolescents with a wide range of psychological difficulties, including serious and persistent mental illness. Services include: individual, couple, family, and group therapy, medication management, day rehabilitation programs, residential rehabilitation programs, substance abuse counseling supported housing. Our Philosophy The mission and guiding principle of Vesta, Inc is to make each client and their personal development a priority. All individuals, regardless of their illness or housing status, are entitled to a quality of life which includes stable housing, employment, and community involvement. Vesta recognizes there are barriers and limitations in the form of stigma, funding, and availability of programs to meet the goals of those we serve and is dedicated to overcoming those obstacles.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 152
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Davis Behavioral Health, Inc.

934 South Main Street, Layton, 84041, US
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dbhutah.org

Davis Behavioral Health is a private, non-profit corporation providing behavioral health services to residents of Davis County. Comprehensive and integrated behavioral health services are available for adults, adolescents, and children; the wide range of programs and services allow for specific and appropriate treatment. DBH works with those seeking treatment for themselves or a loved one, as well as with referring health or mental health professionals. To learn if DBH professionals can help you, call 801-773-7060.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 236
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vesta-inc.jpeg
Vesta, Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/davis-behavioral-health-inc-.jpeg
Davis Behavioral Health, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Vesta, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Davis Behavioral Health, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vesta, Inc in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Vesta, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vesta, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vesta-inc.jpeg
Vesta, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/davis-behavioral-health-inc-.jpeg
Davis Behavioral Health, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Vesta, Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Vesta, Inc company.

In the current year, Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company and Vesta, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company nor Vesta, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company nor Vesta, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company nor Vesta, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Vesta, Inc company nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Vesta, Inc nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Vesta, Inc company nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company employs more people globally than Vesta, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Vesta, Inc nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Vesta, Inc nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Vesta, Inc nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Vesta, Inc nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Vesta, Inc nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Vesta, Inc nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References