Comparison Overview

VeryPC

VS

Sole Source Technology

VeryPC

75 Parkwood Road, Sheffield, S3 8AL, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Established in 2004, VeryPC initially provided computer hardware and managed IT services to charities and local businesses. Recognising a gap in the UK market, VeryPC set out to manufacture high-quality, sustainable computer hardware tailored for the education sector. We manufacture and supply IT products and services to schools across the UK. We are dedicated to simplifying our customers’ work lives, saving them time, and delivering a world-class experience that supports them in achieving the best outcomes for their organisations. Building honest and long-lasting relationships is at the core of our business philosophy. We position ourselves as trusted advisors and extensions to our customers’ operations. Every aspect of VeryPC’s products is designed to solve customer problems and provide them with time-saving solutions through innovative product design, configuration options, and services.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sole Source Technology

92 Argonaut, Suite 100, Aliso Viejo, CA, 92656, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Sole Source connects the world’s leading technology companies with government and commercial end users, providing the leading edge of hardware, software and services. We support Value Added Resellers and their customers by reducing cost, delivering quickly, driving profitability and providing a sustained competitive advantage. We can also locate and deliver hard to find and legacy products and connect you to the global supply quickly, efficiently and affordably. We are the choice for many Federal Government VARS, providing TAA compliant products and greatly simplifying the supply chain.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/verypc.jpeg
VeryPC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sole-source-technology.jpeg
Sole Source Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
VeryPC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sole Source Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VeryPC in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sole Source Technology in 2025.

Incident History — VeryPC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VeryPC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sole Source Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sole Source Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/verypc.jpeg
VeryPC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sole-source-technology.jpeg
Sole Source Technology
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sole Source Technology company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to VeryPC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sole Source Technology company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to VeryPC company.

In the current year, Sole Source Technology company and VeryPC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sole Source Technology company nor VeryPC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sole Source Technology company nor VeryPC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sole Source Technology company nor VeryPC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither VeryPC company nor Sole Source Technology company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither VeryPC nor Sole Source Technology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither VeryPC company nor Sole Source Technology company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

VeryPC company employs more people globally than Sole Source Technology company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither VeryPC nor Sole Source Technology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither VeryPC nor Sole Source Technology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither VeryPC nor Sole Source Technology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither VeryPC nor Sole Source Technology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither VeryPC nor Sole Source Technology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither VeryPC nor Sole Source Technology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H