Comparison Overview

Verisk

VS

Wolters Kluwer

Verisk

545 Washington Blvd., Jersey City, NJ, 07310, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Verisk provides expert data-driven analytic insights that help business, people, and societies become stronger, more resilient, and sustainable. Since we opened our doors in 1971, we’ve been driven by a passion for using data and insights to make a difference—helping protect people, economies, society, and our planet. For more than 50 years, we’ve combined our unique data with advanced technologies in new ways to unlock meaningful insights about risk, moving forward to become a global leader in cutting-edge analytics. We’ve stayed at the forefront of developing innovations to help customers manage the risks they face. Globally, we’re more than 7,500 people strong, all of us on a mission to achieve both profitable outcomes and positive societal impact. Verisk has received U.S. certification from Great Place to Work® for seven consecutive years. Verisk has also earned Great Place to Work certifications in the United Kingdom, Spain, Poland and India. In addition, Verisk was named one of the 2022 Best Workplaces in New York by Fortune magazine and Great Place to Work. In the United Kingdom, Verisk was recognized by Great Place to Work as a Best Workplace for women, tech and well-being. Verisk was also honored on the Best Workplaces lists in the UK, Spain and Málaga. We’re focused on making the world better, safer, and stronger. Verisk is a member of the UN Global Compact, the world’s largest corporate citizenship and sustainability initiative. To keep up on the latest Verisk news, follow us on Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition: Other Information Services
Employees: 5,323
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Wolters Kluwer

Zuidpoolsingel 2, None, Alphen aan den Rijn, None, NL, 2400 BA
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Wolters Kluwer (EURONEXT: WKL) is a global leader in professional information, software solutions, and services for the healthcare, tax and accounting, financial and corporate compliance, legal and regulatory, and corporate performance and ESG sectors. We help our customers make critical decisions every day by providing expert solutions that combine deep domain knowledge with specialized technology and services.    Wolters Kluwer reported 2024 annual revenues of €5.9 billion. The group serves customers in over 180 countries, maintains operations in over 40 countries, and employs approximately 21,000 people worldwide. The company is headquartered in Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands. Beware of Recruitment Fraud! 🔒 Scammers may pose as Wolters Kluwer, offering fake job opportunities and requesting personal info or payments. Protect yourself: - Apply only via our secure Workday hub on our Careers page. - Our recruiters never ask for banking info or payments. - We don't use public email accounts (e.g., Hotmail, Yahoo, Gmail). Report suspected fraud: [email protected]. If you've made a payment, contact local authorities. Read more here - https://careers.wolterskluwer.com/en/recruitment-fraud-alert

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition: Other Information Services
Employees: 23,318
Subsidiaries: 44
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/verisk-analytics.jpeg
Verisk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wolters-kluwer.jpeg
Wolters Kluwer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Verisk
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wolters Kluwer
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Verisk in 2025.

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Average (This Year)

Wolters Kluwer has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Verisk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Verisk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wolters Kluwer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wolters Kluwer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/verisk-analytics.jpeg
Verisk
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2015
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wolters-kluwer.jpeg
Wolters Kluwer
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Verisk company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wolters Kluwer company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Verisk company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Wolters Kluwer company.

In the current year, Wolters Kluwer company has reported more cyber incidents than Verisk company.

Neither Wolters Kluwer company nor Verisk company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Wolters Kluwer company and Verisk company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Wolters Kluwer company nor Verisk company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Verisk company nor Wolters Kluwer company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Verisk nor Wolters Kluwer holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Wolters Kluwer company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Verisk company.

Wolters Kluwer company employs more people globally than Verisk company, reflecting its scale as a Information Services.

Neither Verisk nor Wolters Kluwer holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Verisk nor Wolters Kluwer holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Verisk nor Wolters Kluwer holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Verisk nor Wolters Kluwer holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Verisk nor Wolters Kluwer holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Verisk nor Wolters Kluwer holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H