Comparison Overview

Venture House

VS

The Saturday Center

Venture House

150-10 Hillside Avenue, Jamaica, New York, 11432, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Venture House is a non-profit organization located in Queens, New York. Since 1988 Venture House has been dedicated to providing a range of high quality services to adults diagnosed with mental illness to live and work successfully in the community, independently and with dignity. Venture House has one unifying vision: to enable individuals diagnosed with mental illness to live meaningful and productive lives in the community. We believe that member participants are entitled to the same rights as all people. Those rights include access to: work, relationships, sustained income, housing, medical care, and education. The Clubhouse Model has developed over the past 60 years to become a community center where members share responsibilities to keep the Clubhouse functioning and to meet the members'​ life goals. Clubhouses are programs where members (program participants) work side-by-side with staff on the work of the organization. Tasks include: clerical work, data entry, food service, cleaning, bookkeeping, research and a great deal more. Clubhouse supports are comprehensive - working to ensure that members have access to housing, educational advancement, quality healthcare, government benefits, and job opportunities. Venture House succeeds because members and staff are partners in operating Venture House and members are supported in directing their own life plan.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Saturday Center

3201 Wilshire Blvd #201, Santa Monica, 90403, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Saturday Center has a dual mission. It provides the highest quality psychotherapy to the community at affordable fees and in a private practice setting. And it provides a unique training program for students of psychotherapy in which they learn to recognize and understand the critical role of their own character structures in the essential therapeutic relationships with their clients.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/venture-house.jpeg
Venture House
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saturday-center-for-psychotherapy.jpeg
The Saturday Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Venture House
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Saturday Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Venture House in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Saturday Center in 2026.

Incident History — Venture House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Venture House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Saturday Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Saturday Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/venture-house.jpeg
Venture House
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saturday-center-for-psychotherapy.jpeg
The Saturday Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Venture House company and The Saturday Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Saturday Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Venture House company.

In the current year, The Saturday Center company and Venture House company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Saturday Center company nor Venture House company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Saturday Center company nor Venture House company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Saturday Center company nor Venture House company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Venture House company nor The Saturday Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Venture House nor The Saturday Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Venture House company nor The Saturday Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Venture House company employs more people globally than The Saturday Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Venture House nor The Saturday Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Venture House nor The Saturday Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Venture House nor The Saturday Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Venture House nor The Saturday Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Venture House nor The Saturday Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Venture House nor The Saturday Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N