Comparison Overview

vAuto by Cox Automotive

VS

Wolt

vAuto by Cox Automotive

6205 a Peachtree Dunwoody Rd NE, Atlanta, 30328, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.vauto.com

A Cox Automotive brand since 2010, vAuto provides an industry-leading suite of inventory management solutions to help automotive dealers run their businesses better. Our solutions combine superior retail/wholesale market data and data science-driven insights to enable seamless, strategy-minded decision-making across the entire inventory lifecycle, from sourcing to selling. Our Performance Managers help clients optimize the benefit and value our end-to-end solutions provide. Our latest innovations, including ProfitTime GPS, harness the power of AI and machine learning to help the best dealers run even better.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 381
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4
View Profile

Wolt

Pohjoinen Rautatiekatu 21, Helsinki, Uusimaa, FI, 00100
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
https://careers.wolt.com/en

Wolt is a Helsinki-based technology company with a mission to bring joy, simplicity and earnings to the neighborhoods of the world. Wolt develops a local commerce platform that connects people looking to order food, groceries, and other goods with people interested in selling and delivering them. Wolt was founded in 2014 and joined forces with DoorDash (NASDAQ: DASH) in 2022. Together, we operate in more than 30 countries today.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 11,398
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vauto.jpeg
vAuto by Cox Automotive
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wolt-oy.jpeg
Wolt
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
vAuto by Cox Automotive
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wolt
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for vAuto by Cox Automotive in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wolt in 2026.

Incident History — vAuto by Cox Automotive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

vAuto by Cox Automotive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wolt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wolt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vauto.jpeg
vAuto by Cox Automotive
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Exploit (CVE-2025-61882), Unauthenticated Access, Multi-Stage Java Implants, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Internal (Insider)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Automated Collection Methods
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wolt-oy.jpeg
Wolt
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wolt company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to vAuto by Cox Automotive company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

vAuto by Cox Automotive company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Wolt company has not reported any.

In the current year, Wolt company and vAuto by Cox Automotive company have not reported any cyber incidents.

vAuto by Cox Automotive company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Wolt company has not reported such incidents publicly.

vAuto by Cox Automotive company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Wolt company has not reported such incidents publicly.

vAuto by Cox Automotive company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Wolt company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither vAuto by Cox Automotive company nor Wolt company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither vAuto by Cox Automotive nor Wolt holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

vAuto by Cox Automotive company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Wolt company.

Wolt company employs more people globally than vAuto by Cox Automotive company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither vAuto by Cox Automotive nor Wolt holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither vAuto by Cox Automotive nor Wolt holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither vAuto by Cox Automotive nor Wolt holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither vAuto by Cox Automotive nor Wolt holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither vAuto by Cox Automotive nor Wolt holds HIPAA certification.

Neither vAuto by Cox Automotive nor Wolt holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References