Comparison Overview

Västra Götalandsregionen

VS

U.S. Department of the Treasury

Västra Götalandsregionen

Västra Götalandsregionen, Vänersborg, 462 80, SE
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

Region Västra Götaland is governed by democratically elected politicians and with just over 50,000 employees is one of Sweden’s biggest employers. It is tasked with offering good healthcare and dental care and providing the prerequisites for good public health, a rich cultural life, a good environment, jobs, research, education and good communications. All together, these provide a foundation for sustainable growth in Västra Götaland. Koncernen Västra Götalandsregionen finns till för människorna i Västra Götaland och för allt som ligger invånarna nära: jobb, utbildning, hälso- och sjukvård, kultur och kommunikationer. Västra Götalandsregionen ska bidra till hälsa och trygghet i vardagen och för ett livskraftigt Västra Götaland nu och i framtiden. Vi har ett gemensamt ansvar att se till den enskilda människans behov och till regionmedborgarnas samlade behov för att uppnå visionen Det goda livet. Det gör vi inom våra tre ansvarsområden: Hälso- och sjukvård, tillväxt och utveckling och kollektivtrafik. Koncernen har drygt 50 000 medarbetare som arbetar inom framförallt hälso-och sjukvård men även inom kollektivtrafik, kulturverksamhet, skolor, folktandvård, lokal- och fastighetsförvaltning och folkhälsofrågor. Att arbeta i Västra Götalandsregionen gör avtryck – hos människor, i samhället och för framtiden. Lediga tjänster finns på: www.vgregion.se/jobb

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 16,663
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

U.S. Department of the Treasury

1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, 20005, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 600 and 649

The Treasury Department is the executive agency responsible for promoting economic prosperity and ensuring the financial security of the United States. The Department is responsible for a wide range of activities such as advising the President on economic and financial issues, encouraging sustainable economic growth, and fostering improved governance in financial institutions. The Department of the Treasury operates and maintains systems that are critical to the nation's financial infrastructure, such as the production of coin and currency, the disbursement of payments to the American public, revenue collection, and the borrowing of funds necessary to run the federal government. The Department works with other federal agencies, foreign governments, and international financial institutions to encourage global economic growth, raise standards of living, and to the extent possible, predict and prevent economic and financial crises. The Treasury Department also performs a critical and far-reaching role in enhancing national security by implementing economic sanctions against foreign threats to the U.S., identifying and targeting the financial support networks of national security threats, and improving the safeguards of our financial systems.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 14,324
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vastra-gotalandsregionen.jpeg
Västra Götalandsregionen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-treasury.jpeg
U.S. Department of the Treasury
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Västra Götalandsregionen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
U.S. Department of the Treasury
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Västra Götalandsregionen in 2026.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Department of the Treasury in 2026.

Incident History — Västra Götalandsregionen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Västra Götalandsregionen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — U.S. Department of the Treasury (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Department of the Treasury cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vastra-gotalandsregionen.jpeg
Västra Götalandsregionen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-treasury.jpeg
U.S. Department of the Treasury
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: exploitation of trusted cloud relationships (SaaS providers, Microsoft CSPs), zero-day vulnerabilities (e.g., Citrix NetScaler CVE-2023-3519, Ivanti Pulse Connect CVE-2025-0282), ProxyLogon (Microsoft Exchange), compromised SOHO devices as proxies, web shells (Neo-reGeorg, China Chopper), custom Linux RAT (CloudedHope)
Motivation: cyberespionage (targeting government, technology, legal, and professional services for sensitive data)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Espionage, Strategic Advantage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploited flaws in BeyondTrust software
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Västra Götalandsregionen company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to U.S. Department of the Treasury company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

U.S. Department of the Treasury company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Västra Götalandsregionen company has not reported any.

In the current year, U.S. Department of the Treasury company and Västra Götalandsregionen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither U.S. Department of the Treasury company nor Västra Götalandsregionen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

U.S. Department of the Treasury company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Västra Götalandsregionen company has not reported such incidents publicly.

U.S. Department of the Treasury company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Västra Götalandsregionen company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Västra Götalandsregionen company nor U.S. Department of the Treasury company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Västra Götalandsregionen nor U.S. Department of the Treasury holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Västra Götalandsregionen company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to U.S. Department of the Treasury company.

Västra Götalandsregionen company employs more people globally than U.S. Department of the Treasury company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Västra Götalandsregionen nor U.S. Department of the Treasury holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Västra Götalandsregionen nor U.S. Department of the Treasury holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Västra Götalandsregionen nor U.S. Department of the Treasury holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Västra Götalandsregionen nor U.S. Department of the Treasury holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Västra Götalandsregionen nor U.S. Department of the Treasury holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Västra Götalandsregionen nor U.S. Department of the Treasury holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N