Comparison Overview

Greater Vancouver Board of Trade

VS

Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe

Greater Vancouver Board of Trade

999 Canada Place, Suite 400, Vancouver, BC, CA, V6C 3E1
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

OUR PURPOSE: To lead, unite and champion business to ensure Greater Vancouver is thriving and our region is the best place to live and work. OUR VISION: To be an active, innovative, trusted, credible business organization, known for influencing decision-makers, and educating, connecting with, and engaging our communities. OUR MISSION: To provide leadership, information and connections, and public policy support that help ensure the Greater Vancouver region is competitive and the preferred Pacific Gateway for trade, commerce, and travel. WE ARE informed, respectful, principled, collaborative, and professional.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 125
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe

Council of Europe Avenue de l’Europe, Strasbourg, F-67075, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749

The Pompidou Group (Council of Europe International Cooperation Group on Drugs and Addiction) is the Council of Europe’s drug policy co-operation platform - an asset for Europe and a source of support for the global community. We provide tools that enable decision makers to implement effective measures to reduce drug trafficking, better treat substance use disorders and address the associated negative impacts in society. Currently, the Pompidou Group has 41 member states. The social media channels of the Pompidou Group inform you about our events, we tell stories about our projects and activities and those of our partners. We also share with you our passion: drug policy. Not all the content we share is the result of the work of the Pompidou Group or the Council of Europe. Sometimes we share links or articles on relevant drug policy issues that our experts collected and selected for you. Sometimes they contain opinions that are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe or the Pompidou Group. We look forward to your feedback and reactions. We love to read your comments and we don’t forget to respond to them. Datenschutz: Auf dieser Seite gilt die Datenschutz-Erklärung unser Webseite: https://pheno.berlin/datenschutz/

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vancouver-board-of-trade.jpeg
Greater Vancouver Board of Trade
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pompidou-group-of-the-council-of-europe.jpeg
Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Greater Vancouver Board of Trade
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greater Vancouver Board of Trade in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe in 2025.

Incident History — Greater Vancouver Board of Trade (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greater Vancouver Board of Trade cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vancouver-board-of-trade.jpeg
Greater Vancouver Board of Trade
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pompidou-group-of-the-council-of-europe.jpeg
Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Greater Vancouver Board of Trade company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Greater Vancouver Board of Trade company.

In the current year, Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe company and Greater Vancouver Board of Trade company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe company nor Greater Vancouver Board of Trade company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe company nor Greater Vancouver Board of Trade company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe company nor Greater Vancouver Board of Trade company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Greater Vancouver Board of Trade company nor Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Greater Vancouver Board of Trade nor Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Greater Vancouver Board of Trade company.

Greater Vancouver Board of Trade company employs more people globally than Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Greater Vancouver Board of Trade nor Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Greater Vancouver Board of Trade nor Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Greater Vancouver Board of Trade nor Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Greater Vancouver Board of Trade nor Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Greater Vancouver Board of Trade nor Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Greater Vancouver Board of Trade nor Pompidou Group of the Council of Europe holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H