Comparison Overview

Van Scoyoc Associates

VS

Boonslick Regional Planning Commission

Van Scoyoc Associates

800 Maine Ave SW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20024, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

For more than 30 years, Van Scoyoc Associates (VSA) has been developing and executing tailored government affairs strategies for its clients. With a deep bench of policy experts, a network spanning Capitol Hill and the Federal agencies, and the know-how to achieve results, VSA is the first choice for organizations needing assistance in Washington. While growing into one of the most successful firms in DC, VSA has never forgotten where we started and the original secret to our success, which is why our clients continue to get the personal attention of a small, entrepreneurial company. We always assign specific principals and staff to each client to ensure direct lines of communication and accountability. At the same time, every VSA client is able to rely on the wealth of knowledge, experience, and contacts of the entire firm in order to achieve their goals.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Boonslick Regional Planning Commission

111 Steinhagen, Warrenton, Missouri 63383, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Boonslick Regional Planning Commission is a certified Economic Development District, collaborator with regional Economic Development councils, Missouri Job Center for Workforce Development, transportation planning partner with MoDOT, operator of MO Rides, and the administrative body for the Region I Solid Waste Management District and the Region C Homeland Security Oversight Committee. Our membership includes the local government entities in Lincoln, Montgomery, and Warren counties in the East Central portion of Missouri. The main office is located at 111 Steinhagen Rd, Warrenton, MO 63383.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/van-scoyoc-associates.jpeg
Van Scoyoc Associates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boonslick-regional-planning.jpeg
Boonslick Regional Planning Commission
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Van Scoyoc Associates
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Boonslick Regional Planning Commission
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Van Scoyoc Associates in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boonslick Regional Planning Commission in 2025.

Incident History — Van Scoyoc Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Van Scoyoc Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Boonslick Regional Planning Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boonslick Regional Planning Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/van-scoyoc-associates.jpeg
Van Scoyoc Associates
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boonslick-regional-planning.jpeg
Boonslick Regional Planning Commission
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Boonslick Regional Planning Commission company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Van Scoyoc Associates company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Boonslick Regional Planning Commission company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Van Scoyoc Associates company.

In the current year, Boonslick Regional Planning Commission company and Van Scoyoc Associates company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Boonslick Regional Planning Commission company nor Van Scoyoc Associates company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Boonslick Regional Planning Commission company nor Van Scoyoc Associates company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Boonslick Regional Planning Commission company nor Van Scoyoc Associates company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Van Scoyoc Associates company nor Boonslick Regional Planning Commission company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Van Scoyoc Associates nor Boonslick Regional Planning Commission holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Van Scoyoc Associates company nor Boonslick Regional Planning Commission company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Van Scoyoc Associates company employs more people globally than Boonslick Regional Planning Commission company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Van Scoyoc Associates nor Boonslick Regional Planning Commission holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Van Scoyoc Associates nor Boonslick Regional Planning Commission holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Van Scoyoc Associates nor Boonslick Regional Planning Commission holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Van Scoyoc Associates nor Boonslick Regional Planning Commission holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Van Scoyoc Associates nor Boonslick Regional Planning Commission holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Van Scoyoc Associates nor Boonslick Regional Planning Commission holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N