Comparison Overview

Valley Vista VT

VS

Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County

Valley Vista VT

23 Upper Plain, Bradford, Vermont, US, 05033
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Valley Vista is a 100-bed residential alcohol and chemical dependency treatment center with locations in Bradford and Vergennes, Vermont. The treatment center offers comprehensive, empathetic addiction rehabilitation services for men, women and adolescents in a safe and secure therapeutic environment. Valley Vista uses a best practices abstinence-based approach rooted in 12-Step recovery programs such as Alcoholic Anonymous. The goal is to treat patients with the highest addiction acuity, often complicated by co-occurring mental conditions, to live a life that is happy, joyous and free from addiction. From medically monitored detoxification and mental health services to discharge and comprehensive aftercare planning, the highly-qualified Valley Vista clinical team works with patients to improve their personal, physical, emotional, mental, spiritual, familial and social functioning helping to rebuild self-esteem and perceived self worth. The outcome is a platform from which to build an enduring sober life. Valley Vista works with Green Mountain Cared, NH Medicaid, Fidelis Care, the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Cigna, Beacon Health Options, CBA, MVP, Harvard Pilgrim, United Behavioral Health, and Martin's Point (managed by Maine Health Accountable Care Organization). And where we don't have agreements in place with commercial insurance companies that provide coverage for behavioral health, addiction treatment and dual diagnosis, Valley Vista will work towards single-case agreements ensuring that patients get the care they need and the coverage needed to ensure a journey towards enduring recovery. Valley Vista has been recognized by the state of Vermont and the Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Institute for its outstanding dual diagnosis capabilities in addiction treatment. The facility has been commended by Magellan Behavioral Health for outstanding outcome results as compared to other similar treatment providers, nationally.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County

100 East Avenue, Norwalk, CT, 06851, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

OUR MISSION: To provide to children and their families comprehensive mental health, evaluation, treatment, and prevention services, which promote optimal levels of functioning in home, school and community. At the Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County we help children and their families recover from the trauma of behavioral health conditions affecting their quality of life. The children we work with are often the most at-risk and behaviorally challenged youth in our community. Since 1956, the Center has provided comprehensive behavioral health care to tens of thousands of children and their families. We provide (in both English and Spanish) a full range of prevention and treatment services to address virtually every facet of a child’s psychological, behavioral and emotional health. Our goal is to keep children and families healthy, functional, and at home, school and in the community in order to avoid out of home placement. We help children overcome behavioral and mental health challenges such as aggression, anger, frustration, depression, poor peer relationships, and other behaviors which put them at risk. The Center teaches coping strategies to assist children in making positive choices, graduating from school, and fostering harmonious family relationships. The Center’s services are available to everyone without regard to physical or mental abilities, gender, ethnicity or ability to pay.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valley-vista---addiction-treatment-services.jpeg
Valley Vista VT
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/child-guidance-center-of-mid-fairfield-county.jpeg
Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Valley Vista VT
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Valley Vista VT in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County in 2026.

Incident History — Valley Vista VT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Valley Vista VT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valley-vista---addiction-treatment-services.jpeg
Valley Vista VT
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/child-guidance-center-of-mid-fairfield-county.jpeg
Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Valley Vista VT company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Valley Vista VT company.

In the current year, Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County company and Valley Vista VT company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County company nor Valley Vista VT company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County company nor Valley Vista VT company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County company nor Valley Vista VT company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Valley Vista VT company nor Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Valley Vista VT nor Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Valley Vista VT company nor Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Valley Vista VT company employs more people globally than Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Valley Vista VT nor Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Valley Vista VT nor Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Valley Vista VT nor Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Valley Vista VT nor Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Valley Vista VT nor Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Valley Vista VT nor Child Guidance Center of Mid-Fairfield County holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N