Comparison Overview

Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care

VS

Davis Behavioral Health, Inc.

Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care

325 West Gowe Street, Kent, WA, 98032, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Valley Cities is a community behavioral health center established by the people of South King County in 1965. Today, we operate comprehensive neighborhood clinics in Auburn, Enumclaw, Federal Way, Kent, Midway, Seattle, Rainier Beach and Renton. Life challenges each of us at times -- but we believe deeply in the strength and resiliency of the human spirit. That with help, people can overcome the obstacles that confront them.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 357
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Davis Behavioral Health, Inc.

934 South Main Street, Layton, 84041, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Davis Behavioral Health is a private, non-profit corporation providing behavioral health services to residents of Davis County. Comprehensive and integrated behavioral health services are available for adults, adolescents, and children; the wide range of programs and services allow for specific and appropriate treatment. DBH works with those seeking treatment for themselves or a loved one, as well as with referring health or mental health professionals. To learn if DBH professionals can help you, call 801-773-7060.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 236
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valley-cities-counseling-&-consultation.jpeg
Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/davis-behavioral-health-inc-.jpeg
Davis Behavioral Health, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Davis Behavioral Health, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valley-cities-counseling-&-consultation.jpeg
Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/davis-behavioral-health-inc-.jpeg
Davis Behavioral Health, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care company.

In the current year, Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company and Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company nor Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company nor Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company nor Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care company nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care company nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care company employs more people globally than Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Valley Cities Behavioral Health Care nor Davis Behavioral Health, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H