Comparison Overview

Valero

VS

aramco

Valero

One Valero Way, San Antonio, TX, US, 78249
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.valero.com/

Valero is an international manufacturer and marketer of transportation fuels and petrochemical products. We are a Fortune 500 company based in San Antonio, Texas, fueled by nearly 10,000 employees and 15 petroleum refineries with a combined throughput capacity of approximately 3.2 million barrels per day. We also proudly operate 12 ethanol plants in the Mid-Continent of the U.S., with a combined production capacity of 1.6 billion gallons per year. Our petroleum refineries are located in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Valero also is a joint venture partner in Diamond Green Diesel, which operates a renewable diesel plant in Norco, Louisiana. Diamond Green Diesel is North America’s largest biomass-based diesel plant. Valero sells its products in the wholesale rack or bulk markets in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Ireland and Latin America. Approximately 7,000 outlets carry Valero’s brand names. Visit www.valero.com for more information, and click 'Careers' to explore opportunities!

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 10,812
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

aramco

P.O. Box 5000, Dhahran, undefined, 31311, SA
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://www.aramco.com

We’re a leading producer of the energy and chemicals that drive global commerce and enhance the daily lives of people around the globe by continuing delivering an uninterrupted supply of energy to the world. Our resilience and agility has built one of the world’s largest integrated energy and chemicals companies. And we are part of the global effort toward building a low carbon economy. Our horizon has never been clearer.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 152,474
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valero-energy.jpeg
Valero
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saudi-aramco.jpeg
aramco
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Valero
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
aramco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Valero in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for aramco in 2025.

Incident History — Valero (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Valero cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — aramco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

aramco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valero-energy.jpeg
Valero
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saudi-aramco.jpeg
aramco
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Cyber warfare, industrial espionage
Blog: Blog

FAQ

aramco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Valero company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

aramco company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Valero company has not reported any.

In the current year, aramco company and Valero company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither aramco company nor Valero company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither aramco company nor Valero company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

aramco company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Valero company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Valero company nor aramco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Valero nor aramco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Valero company nor aramco company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

aramco company employs more people globally than Valero company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither Valero nor aramco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Valero nor aramco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Valero nor aramco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Valero nor aramco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Valero nor aramco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Valero nor aramco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References