Comparison Overview

The University of Texas Medical Branch

VS

Boston Children's Hospital

The University of Texas Medical Branch

301 University Blvd, Galveston, Texas, US, 77550
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

The first academic health center in Texas opened its doors in 1891 and today has four campuses, five health sciences schools, seven institutes for advanced study, a research enterprise that includes one of only two national laboratories dedicated to the safe study of infectious threats to human health, a Level 1 Trauma Center and a health system offering a full range of primary and specialized medical services throughout the Texas Gulf Coast region. UTMB is an institution in The University of Texas System and a member of the Texas Medical Center.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,743
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Boston Children's Hospital

300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA, US, 02215
Last Update: 2026-01-17

Boston Children's Hospital is a 404-bed comprehensive center for pediatric health care. As one of the largest pediatric medical centers in the United States, Boston Children's offers a complete range of health care services for children from birth through 21 years of age. (Our services can begin interventions at 15 weeks gestation and in some situations we also treat adults.) We have approximately 25,000 inpatient admissions each year and our 200+ specialized clinical programs schedule 557,000 visits annually. Last year, the hospital performed more than 26,500 surgical procedures and 214,000 radiological examinations. Our team of physicians and nurses has been recognized by a number of independent organizations for overall excellence, and we're proud to share some notable examples with you here.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 17,837
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/utmb.jpeg
The University of Texas Medical Branch
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bostonchildrenshospital.jpeg
Boston Children's Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The University of Texas Medical Branch
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Boston Children's Hospital
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Texas Medical Branch in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston Children's Hospital in 2026.

Incident History — The University of Texas Medical Branch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Texas Medical Branch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Boston Children's Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston Children's Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/utmb.jpeg
The University of Texas Medical Branch
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bostonchildrenshospital.jpeg
Boston Children's Hospital
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Software Exploit
Blog: Blog

FAQ

The University of Texas Medical Branch company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boston Children's Hospital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Boston Children's Hospital company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The University of Texas Medical Branch company has not reported any.

In the current year, Boston Children's Hospital company and The University of Texas Medical Branch company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Boston Children's Hospital company nor The University of Texas Medical Branch company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Boston Children's Hospital company nor The University of Texas Medical Branch company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Boston Children's Hospital company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while The University of Texas Medical Branch company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The University of Texas Medical Branch company nor Boston Children's Hospital company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The University of Texas Medical Branch nor Boston Children's Hospital holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Boston Children's Hospital company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The University of Texas Medical Branch company.

Boston Children's Hospital company employs more people globally than The University of Texas Medical Branch company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither The University of Texas Medical Branch nor Boston Children's Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The University of Texas Medical Branch nor Boston Children's Hospital holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The University of Texas Medical Branch nor Boston Children's Hospital holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The University of Texas Medical Branch nor Boston Children's Hospital holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The University of Texas Medical Branch nor Boston Children's Hospital holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The University of Texas Medical Branch nor Boston Children's Hospital holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H