Comparison Overview

Ute Mountain Casino Hotel

VS

Fantasy Springs Resort Casino

Ute Mountain Casino Hotel

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Welcome to Ute Mountain Casino Hotel we are located 11 miles South of Cortez, Colorado beneath the expansive western sky in Towaoc, Colorado. We are the states first tribal gaming facility & the largest in the Four Corners area. We're nestled in the shadow of the legendary Sleeping Ute Mountain. We offer Southwestern hospitality, friendly faces, good food & gaming excitement with great job opportunities too!

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 119
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fantasy Springs Resort Casino

84-245 Indio Springs Pkwy., Indio, CA, 92203, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Located in the beautiful Palm Springs area, Fantasy Springs Resort Casino offers all you need for a fun-filled getaway or complete destination vacation. Whether your fantasy includes luxurious hotel rooms, exciting Vegas-style gambling options, fabulous dining, world-class entertainment, golf or poolside lounging, you’ll find it all here. This 250-room Palm Springs hotel features brand-new luxurious rooms many with spectacular mountain views.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 333
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ute-mountain-casino-hotel-&-resort.jpeg
Ute Mountain Casino Hotel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fantasy-springs-resort-casino.jpeg
Fantasy Springs Resort Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ute Mountain Casino Hotel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fantasy Springs Resort Casino
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ute Mountain Casino Hotel in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fantasy Springs Resort Casino in 2025.

Incident History — Ute Mountain Casino Hotel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ute Mountain Casino Hotel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fantasy Springs Resort Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fantasy Springs Resort Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ute-mountain-casino-hotel-&-resort.jpeg
Ute Mountain Casino Hotel
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fantasy-springs-resort-casino.jpeg
Fantasy Springs Resort Casino
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fantasy Springs Resort Casino company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ute Mountain Casino Hotel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fantasy Springs Resort Casino company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ute Mountain Casino Hotel company.

In the current year, Fantasy Springs Resort Casino company and Ute Mountain Casino Hotel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fantasy Springs Resort Casino company nor Ute Mountain Casino Hotel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fantasy Springs Resort Casino company nor Ute Mountain Casino Hotel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fantasy Springs Resort Casino company nor Ute Mountain Casino Hotel company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ute Mountain Casino Hotel company nor Fantasy Springs Resort Casino company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ute Mountain Casino Hotel nor Fantasy Springs Resort Casino holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ute Mountain Casino Hotel company nor Fantasy Springs Resort Casino company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fantasy Springs Resort Casino company employs more people globally than Ute Mountain Casino Hotel company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Ute Mountain Casino Hotel nor Fantasy Springs Resort Casino holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ute Mountain Casino Hotel nor Fantasy Springs Resort Casino holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ute Mountain Casino Hotel nor Fantasy Springs Resort Casino holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ute Mountain Casino Hotel nor Fantasy Springs Resort Casino holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ute Mountain Casino Hotel nor Fantasy Springs Resort Casino holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ute Mountain Casino Hotel nor Fantasy Springs Resort Casino holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H