Comparison Overview

Utah Foundation

VS

The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics

Utah Foundation

10 W Broadway, Salt Lake City, 84101, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Utah Foundation’s mission is to produce objective, thorough and well-reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for Utahns. Utah Foundation seeks to help decision-makers and citizens understand and address complex issues. Utah Foundation also offers constructive guidance to improve governmental policies, programs and structures. Utah Foundation is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit research organization.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics

31 Beaumont St, Oxford, undefined, OX1 2NP, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

We bridge the interface of theology, economics and business in promoting an enterprise economy built on solid ethical foundations. The Centre for Enterprise, Markets and Ethics (CEME) seeks to address some of the challenges facing 21st Century capitalism. The repercussions of the financial crisis of 2007 were far-reaching and led to the loss of a broadly accepted ethical framework. Indeed confidence has been dented in the entire system of private enterprise, capitalism and an enterprise-based economy. CEME works to articulate a vision for an enterprise economy underpinned by a Judeo-Christian framework. We want to win the argument for both enterprise and morality. We achieve our purposes through events, research and publications. We aim to influence opinion formers and leaders and equip those in business to think through the issues. We think deeply and act globally. We have particular interests in: – The moral basis of wealth creation – Profit, taxation and enterprise – Vocation to business – Philanthropy and social welfare – Ethical challenges Our approach combines high academic excellence in theology, business and economics, with a direct engagement with the business community designed to promote sound ethical behaviour and the wider aims of the common good and the relief of poverty.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/utah-foundation.jpeg
Utah Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-centre-for-enterprise-markets-and-ethics.jpeg
The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Utah Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Utah Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics in 2025.

Incident History — Utah Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Utah Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/utah-foundation.jpeg
Utah Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-centre-for-enterprise-markets-and-ethics.jpeg
The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Utah Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Utah Foundation company.

In the current year, The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company and Utah Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company nor Utah Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company nor Utah Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company nor Utah Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Utah Foundation company nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Utah Foundation nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Utah Foundation company nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Utah Foundation company employs more people globally than The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Utah Foundation nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Utah Foundation nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Utah Foundation nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Utah Foundation nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Utah Foundation nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Utah Foundation nor The Centre for Enterprise, Markets & Ethics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X