Comparison Overview

US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi)

VS

Confidential

US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi)

2840 Manatee Ave E, None, Bradenton, Florida, US, 34208
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ustci.com

US Telecommunications (USTCi) works with Fortune 500 clients such as Verizon, DirecTV, and Blue Triton Brands. We promote our clients’ products and services through face-to-face sales and marketing activities with a focus on reaching customers where they live. As a USTCi Marketing Associate or Sales Representative, you are assigned your own territory of apartment buildings, town homes and condos. Your role is to build relationships with the on-site property staff and residents, providing the personal connection that a website or call center cannot. You will be educating residents about products and services and guiding them to the best solution for their needs.

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Confidential

undefined, Greater New York City, NY, 10007, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849
https://zexx.co.uk/Confidential

Perfect placements. Rapid staffing. We are the foremost provider of exceptional HR solutions. We offer contract, temporary and permanent placement solutions for roles in finance and accounting, technology, marketing and creative, legal, and administrative and customer support. We deliver invaluable industry insights to our clients and commit wholeheartedly to training and mentoring our candidates. Our goal is to connect talented individuals with the job opportunities and employers they desire. Every day, we link over 5000 people to rewarding positions that utilize their skills and foster the development of new expertise for the future.

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 36,162
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ustci.jpeg
US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goconfidentia.jpeg
Confidential
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Confidential
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Confidential in 2025.

Incident History — US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Confidential (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Confidential cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ustci.jpeg
US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi)
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in exposed web interfaces on Cisco's IOS devices
Motivation: Data theft, espionage
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goconfidentia.jpeg
Confidential
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Confidential company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Confidential company has not reported any.

In the current year, US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) company has reported more cyber incidents than Confidential company.

Neither Confidential company nor US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Confidential company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Confidential company nor US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) company nor Confidential company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) nor Confidential holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) company nor Confidential company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Confidential company employs more people globally than US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) company, reflecting its scale as a Staffing and Recruiting.

Neither US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) nor Confidential holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) nor Confidential holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) nor Confidential holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) nor Confidential holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) nor Confidential holds HIPAA certification.

Neither US Telecommunications, Inc. (USTCi) nor Confidential holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References