Comparison Overview

USSOCOM

VS

British Army

USSOCOM

MacDill Air Force Base, Tampa, FL, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

The Department of Defense activated U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) April 16, 1987, at MacDill Air Force Base, Florida. The DoD created the new unified command in response to congressional action in the Goldwater-Nichols Defense Reorganization Act of 1986 and the Nunn-Cohen Amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act of 1987. Congress mandated a new four-star command be activated to prepare Special Operations Forces (SOF) to carry out assigned missions and, if directed by the president or secretary of defense, to plan for and conduct special operations.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 1,962
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

British Army

Trenchard Lines, Andover, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Joining the British Army, you’ll get much more from life than you ever would with a civilian career – you’ll have the opportunity to do something that really matters, with a team that are like family to you. The sense of belonging in the Army is next level: when you’ve trained with each other and overcome new challenges together, you build bonds that last a lifetime that see you through whatever life throws at you – on and off the battlefield. It doesn’t matter where you’ve come from, or what you’ve studied – if you’ve got drive, determination and the will to make an impact, there’s a place for you here. You’ll have access to world-class training and development, and the chance to gain valuable qualifications. You’ll get to see the world – from skiing in Europe, to white-water rafting in the States, to being on operations across the globe. You’ll have the chance to make a difference, realise your potential, and make people proud. Regular or Reserve, Officer or Soldier – whatever role you’re in, the bonds you build here will be unbreakable, and the memories will last forever. If you’re looking for adventure, opportunity, and friends for life, it’s time to find where you belong. You Belong Here: Join the British Army.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 33,417
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ussocom.jpeg
USSOCOM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/british-army.jpeg
British Army
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
USSOCOM
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
British Army
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for USSOCOM in 2025.

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for British Army in 2025.

Incident History — USSOCOM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

USSOCOM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — British Army (X = Date, Y = Severity)

British Army cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ussocom.jpeg
USSOCOM
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/british-army.jpeg
British Army
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2022
Type:Breach
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

British Army company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to USSOCOM company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

USSOCOM and British Army have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, British Army company and USSOCOM company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither British Army company nor USSOCOM company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both British Army company and USSOCOM company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither British Army company nor USSOCOM company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither USSOCOM company nor British Army company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither USSOCOM nor British Army holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

British Army company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to USSOCOM company.

British Army company employs more people globally than USSOCOM company, reflecting its scale as a Armed Forces.

Neither USSOCOM nor British Army holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither USSOCOM nor British Army holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither USSOCOM nor British Army holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither USSOCOM nor British Army holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither USSOCOM nor British Army holds HIPAA certification.

Neither USSOCOM nor British Army holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L