Comparison Overview

USS Midway Museum

VS

Joslyn Art Museum

USS Midway Museum

910 North Harbor Drive, San Diego, CA, 92101, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Commissioned on Sept. 10, 1945, the USS Midway was built in only 17 months and served in the U.S. Navy from 1945-1992, becoming the longest-serving aircraft carrier in the 20th century. On April 11, 1992, Midway was decommissioned in San Diego and was transferred to the Navy’s inactive ship fleet in Bremerton, Washington until 2003, when it was donated to the San Diego Aircraft Carrier Museum, a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization. It opened to the public as the USS Midway Museum in June 2004, in one of the most beautiful locations along San Diego Bay. Over the past 20 years, Midway has become one of the top tourist destinations in Southern California and the most visited ship museum in the United States. The museum features engaging and inspiring exhibits, an award-winning audio tour, dynamic interactive experiences, and more than 700 volunteers - many of whom served on Midway – who help bring naval history to life for visiting guests. Visitors gain a firsthand understanding of naval aviation through its full-motion flight simulators and virtual reality experience, as well as the importance of service and sacrifice at the Battle of the Midway theater. The museum’s more than 30 restored military aircraft tell the story of more than 80 years of naval aviation history. Visitors can also enjoy a bite at the Café 41 eatery and shop at the popular Jet Shop (gift shop). Beyond its exhibits, Midway offers a top-notch education program, hosts hundreds of events annually, and is heavily involved in both the local community, and in programs that support our men and women in uniform. The USS Midway Museum is not only a San Diego icon but is recognized as America's Living Symbol of Freedom.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 244
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Joslyn Art Museum

undefined, undefined, undefined, 68102, US
Last Update: 2026-01-13
Between 750 and 799

Joslyn Art Museum was a gift to the people of Omaha from Sarah Joslyn in memory of her husband, George. From its first day, November 29, 1931, to today, the Museum has welcomed millions of visitors from around the world. The Joslyn’s collection of over 12,000 objects represents 5,000 years of human creativity and the world’s diverse cultures. The campus comprises three stunning buildings—distinct yet connected—surrounded by sculpture gardens. Learning and engagement opportunities abound, and general admission is free to all, always.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uss-midway-museum.jpeg
USS Midway Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joslyn-art-museum.jpeg
Joslyn Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
USS Midway Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Joslyn Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for USS Midway Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Joslyn Art Museum in 2026.

Incident History — USS Midway Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

USS Midway Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Joslyn Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Joslyn Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uss-midway-museum.jpeg
USS Midway Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/joslyn-art-museum.jpeg
Joslyn Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

USS Midway Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Joslyn Art Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Joslyn Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to USS Midway Museum company.

In the current year, Joslyn Art Museum company and USS Midway Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Joslyn Art Museum company nor USS Midway Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Joslyn Art Museum company nor USS Midway Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Joslyn Art Museum company nor USS Midway Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither USS Midway Museum company nor Joslyn Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither USS Midway Museum nor Joslyn Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither USS Midway Museum company nor Joslyn Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

USS Midway Museum company employs more people globally than Joslyn Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither USS Midway Museum nor Joslyn Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither USS Midway Museum nor Joslyn Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither USS Midway Museum nor Joslyn Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither USS Midway Museum nor Joslyn Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither USS Midway Museum nor Joslyn Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither USS Midway Museum nor Joslyn Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N