Comparison Overview

U.S. Department of Education

VS

Queensland Government

U.S. Department of Education

400 Maryland Avenue SW, Washington, 20202, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Our mission is to promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness by fostering educational excellence and ensuring equal access. ED is dedicated to: • Establishing policies on federal financial aid for education, and distributing as well as monitoring those funds. • Collecting data on America's schools and disseminating research. • Focusing national attention on key educational issues. • Prohibiting discrimination and ensuring equal access to education.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 10,612
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Queensland Government

1 William Street, Brisbane, 4000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

ABOUT US We are the largest and most diverse organisation in our state. We have more than 90 government departments and organisations delivering for Queensland across 4000+ locations, from the Torres Strait to the Gold Coast; Mount Isa to Brisbane. This page is monitored by Queensland Government employees from 8am to 5pm, Monday to Friday. HOUSE RULES — all users must comply with LinkedIn policies and terms of use — please do not post content or comments that could be considered • abusive or obscene, name calling, harassment or personal attacks • defamatory towards a person or people • prejudicial, inflammatory or offensive • deceptive, misleading or false information about an individual, organisation, government or entity • personal or sensitive information about yourself or others • in violation of any intellectual property rights, or any other law or regulation • promotion of a product, business, company or organisation • off-topic or spam, including the same comment posted repeatedly. Any content or comments deemed to fit under these definitions will be deleted. Users found to repeatedly post these types of comments will be banned from this page. You should report any offensive material presented on LinkedIn. Complaints about defamatory digital matter or anything you consider to be offensive should be made to the attention of the Public Sector Commission via our website www.psc.qld.gov.au/contact/customer-compliments-and-complaints. A complaint about defamatory digital matter should contain your name, the matter and where it is located, and that you consider the matter to be defamatory. CURRENT CONDITIONS © The State of Queensland (Public Sector Commission) 2026 Subject to LinkedIn’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities, all content released on this page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (BY) 2.5 Australia Licence. Permissions may be available beyond the scope of this licence.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 84,670
Subsidiaries: 62
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/usedgov.jpeg
U.S. Department of Education
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/queensland-government.jpeg
Queensland Government
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
U.S. Department of Education
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Queensland Government
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Department of Education in 2026.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Queensland Government in 2026.

Incident History — U.S. Department of Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Department of Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Queensland Government (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Queensland Government cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/usedgov.jpeg
U.S. Department of Education
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2023
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/queensland-government.jpeg
Queensland Government
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Queensland Government company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to U.S. Department of Education company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

U.S. Department of Education company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Queensland Government company has not reported any.

In the current year, Queensland Government company and U.S. Department of Education company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Queensland Government company nor U.S. Department of Education company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Queensland Government company nor U.S. Department of Education company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Queensland Government company nor U.S. Department of Education company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither U.S. Department of Education company nor Queensland Government company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither U.S. Department of Education nor Queensland Government holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Queensland Government company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to U.S. Department of Education company.

Queensland Government company employs more people globally than U.S. Department of Education company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither U.S. Department of Education nor Queensland Government holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither U.S. Department of Education nor Queensland Government holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither U.S. Department of Education nor Queensland Government holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither U.S. Department of Education nor Queensland Government holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither U.S. Department of Education nor Queensland Government holds HIPAA certification.

Neither U.S. Department of Education nor Queensland Government holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N