Comparison Overview

UScellular

VS

Orange

UScellular

8410 W Bryn Mawr Ave, None, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60631
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 650 and 699

Considering where to invest your time, talent and ambition? Select the team that’s determined to be the best, offering the ability to make a positive difference for every customer, a unique culture and competitive rewards. Choose UScellular. With more than 5.1 million customers, we are one of the nation’s largest wireless carriers. Consistently honored as a top workplace, we empower our 5,400+ associates to make meaningful contributions to our success and that of the communities where we live and work with outreach, education initiatives and volunteerism. Here, you’ll find a broad array of resources for learning and development. You’ll enjoy almost endless opportunities for career advancement and a highly supportive team defined by the Dynamic Organization, a culture rooted in diversity, relationships, respect, empowerment and innovation. If you’re determined to be the best, join our talent network. Then select your ideal opportunity to soar with an industry leader.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 7,583
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Orange

111, Quai du Président Roosevelt, None, Issy-les-Moulineaux, Île-de-France, FR, 92130
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 0 and 549

Orange is one of the world’s leading telecommunications operators with revenues of 40.3 billion euros in 2024 and 127,000 employees worldwide at 31 December 2024, including 71,000 employees in France. The Group has a total customer base of 291 million customers worldwide at 31 December 2024, including 253 million mobile customers and 22 million fixed broadband customers. The Group is present in 26 countries. Orange is also a leading provider of global IT and telecommunication services to multinational companies under the brand Orange Business. In February 2023, the Group presented its strategic plan « Lead the future », built on a new business model and guided by responsibility and efficiency. « Lead the future » capitalizes on network excellence to reinforce Orange's leadership in service quality.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 132,461
Subsidiaries: 26
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uscellular.jpeg
UScellular
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange.jpeg
Orange
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UScellular
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Orange
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UScellular in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

Orange has 294.74% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — UScellular (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UScellular cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Orange (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orange cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uscellular.jpeg
UScellular
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External System Breach (Hacking)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orange.jpeg
Orange
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploitation de données personnelles volées, Ingénierie sociale, SIM swapping
Motivation: Fraude financière, Vol d'identité, Accès non autorisé à des comptes en ligne
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: ransomware (Warlock), system compromise
Motivation: financial gain, data theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

UScellular company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Orange company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Orange company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to UScellular company.

In the current year, Orange company has reported more cyber incidents than UScellular company.

Orange company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while UScellular company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Orange company and UScellular company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Orange company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while UScellular company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UScellular company nor Orange company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UScellular nor Orange holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Orange company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UScellular company.

Orange company employs more people globally than UScellular company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither UScellular nor Orange holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UScellular nor Orange holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UScellular nor Orange holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UScellular nor Orange holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UScellular nor Orange holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UScellular nor Orange holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L