Comparison Overview

USC Center on Public Diplomacy

VS

Microsoft Research

USC Center on Public Diplomacy

3502 Watt Way, Suites 232-234, California, Los Angeles, 90089-0281, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The USC Center on Public Diplomacy (CPD) was established in 2003 as a partnership between the Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism and the School of International Relations at the University of Southern California. It is a research, analysis and professional education organization dedicated to furthering the study and practice of global public engagement and cultural relations. Since its inception, CPD has become a productive and recognized leader in the public diplomacy research and scholarship community. Having benefited from international support within academic, corporate, governmental, and public policy circles, it is now the definitive go-to destination for practitioners and international leaders in public diplomacy, while pursuing an innovative and practical research agenda. For more information, visit the CPD website at http://uscpublicdiplomacy.org, follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/PublicDiplomacy, or find us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/USCCPD/.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Microsoft Research

Redmond, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

At Microsoft Research, we accelerate scientific discovery and technology innovation to empower every person and organization on the planet to achieve more. We do this by bringing together the best minds across diverse disciplines and backgrounds to take on the most pressing research challenges for Microsoft and for society. Our Research Lens We consider research directions through the lens of the positive impact we aspire to create with and for customers, communities, and all of society.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
10
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/usc-center-on-public-diplomacy.jpeg
USC Center on Public Diplomacy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microsoftresearch.jpeg
Microsoft Research
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
USC Center on Public Diplomacy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Microsoft Research
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for USC Center on Public Diplomacy in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Microsoft Research in 2025.

Incident History — USC Center on Public Diplomacy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

USC Center on Public Diplomacy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Microsoft Research (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microsoft Research cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/usc-center-on-public-diplomacy.jpeg
USC Center on Public Diplomacy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microsoftresearch.jpeg
Microsoft Research
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: AI Agent Exploitation (e.g., autonomous decision-making, broad data access), SaaS Infrastructure Compromise (e.g., widely-deployed firewalls), Identity Sprawl (e.g., over-permissioned roles, shadow identities), Synthetic Social Engineering (e.g., deepfakes, adaptive phishing), Critical Infrastructure Targeting (e.g., energy grids, water systems), Supply Chain Attacks (e.g., multi-cloud complexities), Concentrated Infrastructure Risk (e.g., Microsoft, Amazon, Google backbones)
Motivation: Financial Gain (e.g., ransomware, data exfiltration), Geopolitical Disruption (e.g., critical infrastructure sabotage), Espionage (e.g., AI-driven data theft), Market Manipulation (e.g., disrupting cloud providers), Talent Pipeline Exploitation (e.g., targeting entry-level job gaps)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Malicious Extension (VS Code Marketplace), Trojanized npm Packages, GitHub C2, Postinstall Scripts
Motivation: Testing/Experimental (susvsex), Financial Gain (Vidar Infostealer), Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Microsoft Teams Chats/Messages, Malicious Links/Files in Teams, Fake Profiles/Impersonation, Exploiting Privacy Mode Disabled, Guest/External Access Abuse, Public Meeting Links, Teams as Command-and-Control (C2), Ransom Demands via Teams
Motivation: Financial Gain (e.g., Ransomware, Data Theft), Espionage (Corporate/State), Credential Theft, Lateral Movement in Target Networks, Disruption (e.g., Locking Personal/Work Files)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Microsoft Research company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to USC Center on Public Diplomacy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Microsoft Research company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas USC Center on Public Diplomacy company has not reported any.

In the current year, Microsoft Research company has reported more cyber incidents than USC Center on Public Diplomacy company.

Microsoft Research company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while USC Center on Public Diplomacy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Microsoft Research company has disclosed at least one data breach, while USC Center on Public Diplomacy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Microsoft Research company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while USC Center on Public Diplomacy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Microsoft Research company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while USC Center on Public Diplomacy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither USC Center on Public Diplomacy nor Microsoft Research holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Microsoft Research company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to USC Center on Public Diplomacy company.

Neither USC Center on Public Diplomacy nor Microsoft Research holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither USC Center on Public Diplomacy nor Microsoft Research holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither USC Center on Public Diplomacy nor Microsoft Research holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither USC Center on Public Diplomacy nor Microsoft Research holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither USC Center on Public Diplomacy nor Microsoft Research holds HIPAA certification.

Neither USC Center on Public Diplomacy nor Microsoft Research holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X