Comparison Overview

Us Weekly

VS

Atlas Contact

Us Weekly

1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY, 10104, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.usmagazine.com/

Us Weekly is a leading pop culture resource covering entertainment, style, beauty and healthy lifestyle, all through the lens of celebrity. The media brand's unparalleled access results in breaking celebrity stories with credibility and authority, in real-time. The brand boasts nearly 50 million in audience across its multi-platform portfolio, including a top 10 position among all magazines, and one of the top ranking websites for entertainment and celebrity news with 27 million unique visitors.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 106
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Atlas Contact

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.atlascontact.nl

Uitgeverij Atlas Contact is een van de grotere literaire uitgeverijen van Nederland en Vlaanderen, die zich specialiseert in oorspronkelijk Nederlandstalige en vertaalde literaire fictie en non-fictie en daarnaast bestaat uit een pijler die zich richt op het uitgeven van boeken op het gebied van management, economie, werk en loopbaan onder de naam Business Contact. Tot het fonds van uitgeverij Atlas Contact behoren onder andere Adriaan van Dis, Geert Mak, Dimitri Verhulst, Bert Wagendorp, Haruki Murakami, Julian Barnes, Salman Rushdie, Hilary Mantel, Lars Mytting en Bill Bryson. Ook geven ze onder de fondslijn L.J. Veen Klassiek klassiekers uit van onder andere F. Scott Fitzgerald, Lev Tolstoj, Joseph Roth en Charles Dickens.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 100
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-weekly.jpeg
Us Weekly
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlas-contact.jpeg
Atlas Contact
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Us Weekly
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atlas Contact
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Us Weekly in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlas Contact in 2025.

Incident History — Us Weekly (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Us Weekly cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atlas Contact (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlas Contact cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-weekly.jpeg
Us Weekly
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlas-contact.jpeg
Atlas Contact
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Us Weekly company and Atlas Contact company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Atlas Contact company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Us Weekly company.

In the current year, Atlas Contact company and Us Weekly company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Atlas Contact company nor Us Weekly company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Atlas Contact company nor Us Weekly company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Atlas Contact company nor Us Weekly company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Us Weekly company nor Atlas Contact company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Us Weekly nor Atlas Contact holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Us Weekly company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Atlas Contact company.

Us Weekly company employs more people globally than Atlas Contact company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Us Weekly nor Atlas Contact holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Us Weekly nor Atlas Contact holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Us Weekly nor Atlas Contact holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Us Weekly nor Atlas Contact holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Us Weekly nor Atlas Contact holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Us Weekly nor Atlas Contact holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References