Comparison Overview

US Legal Fund, LLC

VS

McCue Law Firm

US Legal Fund, LLC

315 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

US Legal Fund is a leading provider of non-recourse funding solutions on a nationwide basis. We offer fast, friendly, and reliable pre-settlement funding to clients who need relief from financial pressures while they wait for their case to settle. Our management team consists of attorneys who have practiced and fully understand personal injury law and the needs of clients and attorneys. We are an active member of the American Legal Finance Association (ALFA) and strictly adhere to their "best practices."

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

McCue Law Firm

6245 N. Federal Hwy., Ste. 418, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 33308, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We are a husband and wife legal team. We decided to become lawyers because we wanted to help people. Our clients are real people - not corporations. We work with small-business owners, individuals, and their families. We decided long ago that we didn't want to use our skills to help some large, faceless organization more interested in profits than people. Consumer bankruptcy and foreclosure defense provides us with the perfect opportunity to provide our legal skills to assisting those who are in dire need of relief. As we all know, the banking, mortgage, and credit card industries have all gone without meaningful regulation and oversight for many years now. They have run rampant with their corporate greed leaving so many of us in the wake of their destruction. We are blessed to possess the skills required to give struggling people a fighting chance to get back on their feet. We are proud to say that we help real people in need. We don't think there is a much better job in our legal system than helping to make sure that system works right for the average American families it was intended to help.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mccue-law-consumer-attorneys.jpeg
McCue Law Firm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
US Legal Fund, LLC
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
McCue Law Firm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for US Legal Fund, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McCue Law Firm in 2025.

Incident History — US Legal Fund, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Legal Fund, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — McCue Law Firm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McCue Law Firm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-legal-fund-llc.jpeg
US Legal Fund, LLC
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mccue-law-consumer-attorneys.jpeg
McCue Law Firm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both US Legal Fund, LLC company and McCue Law Firm company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, McCue Law Firm company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to US Legal Fund, LLC company.

In the current year, McCue Law Firm company and US Legal Fund, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither McCue Law Firm company nor US Legal Fund, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither McCue Law Firm company nor US Legal Fund, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither McCue Law Firm company nor US Legal Fund, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither US Legal Fund, LLC company nor McCue Law Firm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither US Legal Fund, LLC nor McCue Law Firm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither US Legal Fund, LLC company nor McCue Law Firm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both US Legal Fund, LLC company and McCue Law Firm company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither US Legal Fund, LLC nor McCue Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither US Legal Fund, LLC nor McCue Law Firm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither US Legal Fund, LLC nor McCue Law Firm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither US Legal Fund, LLC nor McCue Law Firm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither US Legal Fund, LLC nor McCue Law Firm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither US Legal Fund, LLC nor McCue Law Firm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X