Comparison Overview

US Army

VS

SANG

US Army

1500 Army Navy Dr, Arlington, Virginia, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Welcome to the official U.S. Army LinkedIn page. The U.S. Army’s mission is to fight and win our Nation’s wars by providing prompt, sustained land dominance across the full range of military operations and spectrum of conflict in support of combatant commanders. If you're looking for news about the U.S. Army, visit http://www.army.mil/ For information about U.S. Army career opportunities https://www.goarmy.com/?iom=BNL7-22-0029_N_OSOC_OCPA_LI_ocpagen_xx_xx.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 346,445
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

SANG

Saudia Arabia Saudia Arabia, 11554, SA
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Saudi Arabian National Guard المهمة الأساسية للحرس الوطني هي : الحفاظ على الأمن، والاستقرار الداخلي للوطن، والدفاع عن مقدّساته ومكتسباته الحضارية . ومن مـهامه الأخرى ما يلي: •حماية المنشآت الحيوية، والإستراتيجية التي يُكَلَّف بها. • المشاركة في وضع خطط الكوارث،وتنفيذها. • المشاركة في حفظ أمن ضيوف الرحمن، خلال مواسم الحج، وتقديم العون والمساعدة، والإرشاد الديني، والرعاية الصحية لهم. • تقديم الخدمات الصحيّة ، والتعليميّة، والثقافيّة، والإعلاميّة، والعناية بالجانب الإرشاديّ والتوجيهيّ، ونشر الوعي الدينيّ لمنسوبيه. • الحفاظ على التراث الوطني، ونشر الثقافة. • المساهمة في تنمية الوطن، وبناء المواطن. • التعاون مع الجهات الرسميّة في نطاق ما تنص عليه الأوامر، وما تقتضيه المصلحة العامة.

NAICS: 928
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-army.jpeg
US Army
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sang.jpeg
SANG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
US Army
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SANG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for US Army in 2025.

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SANG in 2025.

Incident History — US Army (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Army cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SANG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SANG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-army.jpeg
US Army
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2018
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Basic Security Vulnerability
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2015
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Website Hacking
Motivation: Political
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sang.jpeg
SANG
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

US Army company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SANG company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

US Army company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SANG company has not reported any.

In the current year, SANG company and US Army company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SANG company nor US Army company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

US Army company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other SANG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

US Army company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while SANG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

US Army company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while SANG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither US Army nor SANG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

US Army company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SANG company.

US Army company employs more people globally than SANG company, reflecting its scale as a Armed Forces.

Neither US Army nor SANG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither US Army nor SANG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither US Army nor SANG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither US Army nor SANG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither US Army nor SANG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither US Army nor SANG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H