Comparison Overview

Urban LandMark

VS

Sierra Business Council

Urban LandMark

0042, ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

DFID funded agency making urban land markets work better for the poor. Urban LandMark sheds light on what can be done to remedy the problems that have made urban land markets dysfunctional, and hence land unaffordable. It does this by using the development approach known as "making markets work for the poor" while acknowledging the importance of land rights.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sierra Business Council

10183 Truckee Airport Rd., Suite 202, Truckee, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Sierra Business Council is a 501(c)3 nonprofit corporation established in 1994 and has dedicated 30 years to enhancing the Sierra Nevada region through community empowerment, environmental stewardship, and economic development. Headquartered in Truckee, California with satellite offices in Bishop and staff located throughout the region, the organization promotes sustainable regional growth by supporting businesses, solving rural issues, and addressing climate change. SBC's initiatives include economic empowerment through direct technical assistance and development strategies, climate action programs that enhance energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions, and regional advocacy to elevate the Sierra’s interests in policy discussions. Notable achievements include collaboration on establishing the Sierra Nevada Conservancy, launching the Sierra Small Business Development Center, and promoting energy resilience and climate planning via the Sierra Nevada Energy Watch. By integrating social, environmental, and economic impacts, SBC works towards a thriving, resilient Sierra Nevada with diverse economies and restored ecosystems.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/urban-landmark.jpeg
Urban LandMark
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sierra-business-council.jpeg
Sierra Business Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Urban LandMark
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sierra Business Council
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Urban LandMark in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sierra Business Council in 2025.

Incident History — Urban LandMark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Urban LandMark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sierra Business Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sierra Business Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/urban-landmark.jpeg
Urban LandMark
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sierra-business-council.jpeg
Sierra Business Council
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Urban LandMark company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sierra Business Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sierra Business Council company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Urban LandMark company.

In the current year, Sierra Business Council company and Urban LandMark company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sierra Business Council company nor Urban LandMark company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sierra Business Council company nor Urban LandMark company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sierra Business Council company nor Urban LandMark company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Urban LandMark company nor Sierra Business Council company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Urban LandMark nor Sierra Business Council holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Urban LandMark company nor Sierra Business Council company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Urban LandMark nor Sierra Business Council holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Urban LandMark nor Sierra Business Council holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Urban LandMark nor Sierra Business Council holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Urban LandMark nor Sierra Business Council holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Urban LandMark nor Sierra Business Council holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Urban LandMark nor Sierra Business Council holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X