Comparison Overview

UOB

VS

MCB Bank Limited

UOB

80 Raffles Place, Singapore, SG, 048624
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

We’re here to do Right By You. At UOB, we aspire to build a better future for the people and businesses in the region. Through our extensive network and suite of capabilities, we offer financial solutions to the people and businesses within, and connecting with ASEAN. We create solutions tailored to your unique needs through data and relationship-led insights. Our comprehensive regional network and one-bank approach connects your business to new opportunities in ASEAN. We help businesses to advance responsibly and guide personal wealth to grow sustainably. We foster inclusiveness and environmental well-being for stronger societies. This is how we stay committed to forging a sustainable future for generations to come. Note: For the terms of use of our LinkedIn channel, please visit: https://go.uob.com/socialmedia

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 28,225
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

MCB Bank Limited

15 Main Gulberg, Lahore, undefined, -, PK
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to the Official LinkedIn page of MCB Bank Limited. Established in 1947, MCB Bank Limited is one of the largest Banks in Pakistan with a total customer base exceeding 7 million. We have products and services to suit the every need of customers. To learn more about MCB Bank, please visit our website www.mcb.com.pk or call the MCB Contact Center 111-000-622. Disclaimer: MCB Bank will never ask for our customer’s personal data on any public platform. Please avoid sharing any such data via social media.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 13,689
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uob.jpeg
UOB
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcb-bank-limited.jpeg
MCB Bank Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UOB
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MCB Bank Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UOB in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MCB Bank Limited in 2025.

Incident History — UOB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UOB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MCB Bank Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MCB Bank Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uob.jpeg
UOB
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2021
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Impersonation Scam
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcb-bank-limited.jpeg
MCB Bank Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

UOB company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MCB Bank Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UOB company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas MCB Bank Limited company has not reported any.

In the current year, MCB Bank Limited company and UOB company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MCB Bank Limited company nor UOB company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MCB Bank Limited company nor UOB company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MCB Bank Limited company nor UOB company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UOB company nor MCB Bank Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UOB nor MCB Bank Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither UOB company nor MCB Bank Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

UOB company employs more people globally than MCB Bank Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither UOB nor MCB Bank Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UOB nor MCB Bank Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UOB nor MCB Bank Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UOB nor MCB Bank Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UOB nor MCB Bank Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UOB nor MCB Bank Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N