Comparison Overview

UOB

VS

Crédit Agricole Italia

UOB

80 Raffles Place, Singapore, SG, 048624
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

We’re here to do Right By You. At UOB, we aspire to build a better future for the people and businesses in the region. Through our extensive network and suite of capabilities, we offer financial solutions to the people and businesses within, and connecting with ASEAN. We create solutions tailored to your unique needs through data and relationship-led insights. Our comprehensive regional network and one-bank approach connects your business to new opportunities in ASEAN. We help businesses to advance responsibly and guide personal wealth to grow sustainably. We foster inclusiveness and environmental well-being for stronger societies. This is how we stay committed to forging a sustainable future for generations to come. Note: For the terms of use of our LinkedIn channel, please visit: https://go.uob.com/socialmedia

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 28,225
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Crédit Agricole Italia

Via La Spezia, 138 Parma, PR 43126, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Crédit Agricole Italia fa parte del grande Gruppo internazionale Crédit Agricole: un gruppo bancario tra i più solidi nel panorama internazionale e presente in 46 Paesi del mondo, con 53 milioni di Clienti. Il Gruppo Crédit Agricole in Italia conta 6 milioni di Clienti attivi e circa 16.200 collaboratori. Internazionalità, affidabilità, vicinanza e concretezza sono i valori del Gruppo. - FACEBOOK https://www.facebook.com/CreditAgricoleItalia/ @CreditAgricoleItalia - X https://twitter.com/CA_Ita @CA_Ita - INSTAGRAM https://www.instagram.com/creditagricoleitalia/ @creditagricoleitalia - YOUTUBE https://www.youtube.com/creditagricoleitalia -TIK TOK tiktok.com/@creditagricoleitalia @creditagricoleitalia - TUTORED https://www.tutored.me/it/employers/478113/ - INDEED https://it.indeed.com/cmp/Cr%C3%A9dit-Agricole-1

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 48
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uob.jpeg
UOB
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creditagricoleitalia.jpeg
Crédit Agricole Italia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
UOB
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Crédit Agricole Italia
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UOB in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crédit Agricole Italia in 2025.

Incident History — UOB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UOB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Crédit Agricole Italia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crédit Agricole Italia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uob.jpeg
UOB
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2021
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Impersonation Scam
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creditagricoleitalia.jpeg
Crédit Agricole Italia
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

UOB company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Crédit Agricole Italia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

UOB company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Crédit Agricole Italia company has not reported any.

In the current year, Crédit Agricole Italia company and UOB company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Crédit Agricole Italia company nor UOB company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Crédit Agricole Italia company nor UOB company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Crédit Agricole Italia company nor UOB company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither UOB company nor Crédit Agricole Italia company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither UOB nor Crédit Agricole Italia holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Crédit Agricole Italia company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to UOB company.

UOB company employs more people globally than Crédit Agricole Italia company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither UOB nor Crédit Agricole Italia holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither UOB nor Crédit Agricole Italia holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither UOB nor Crédit Agricole Italia holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither UOB nor Crédit Agricole Italia holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither UOB nor Crédit Agricole Italia holds HIPAA certification.

Neither UOB nor Crédit Agricole Italia holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N