Comparison Overview

Unum

VS

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

Unum

1 Fountain Sq., None, Chattanooga, TN, US, 37402
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

Since our founding in 1848, Unum has been a leader in the employee benefits business through innovation, integrity and an unwavering commitment to our customers. This simple philosophy has guided us through America’s fledgling insurance landscape and helped us become an international leader in financial protection benefits, offering disability, life, accident, critical illness, dental, vision and stop-loss insurance; leave and absence management support and behavioral health services.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 11,338
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

Prudential Tower, Jakarta, undefined, 12910, ID
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Listening. Understanding. Delivering. At Prudential Indonesia we deliver excellence by consistently innovating, creating new opportunities and growing our business to cater all of our customers'​ needs. With a vision of becoming truly world class, Prudential Indonesia provides quality services and proven track record of market leadership in the country. Working at Prudential Indonesia gives you many opportunities to develop yourself and explore what you’re really capable of, as well as the perfect environment to collaborate, listen and care for others. Ask around. The more you find out about us, the more you’ll learn that we’re an insurance company that understands you. We are here to listen.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 11,783
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unum.jpeg
Unum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prudential-indonesia-pt-prudential-life-assurance-.jpeg
Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Unum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unum in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) in 2025.

Incident History — Unum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unum.jpeg
Unum
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prudential-indonesia-pt-prudential-life-assurance-.jpeg
Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Unum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Unum company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company and Unum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company nor Unum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Unum company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company nor Unum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Unum company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Unum nor Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Unum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company.

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company employs more people globally than Unum company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Unum nor Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Unum nor Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Unum nor Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Unum nor Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Unum nor Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Unum nor Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H