Comparison Overview

University of Toronto

VS

RMIT University

University of Toronto

27 King's College Circle, Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5S 2J7
Last Update: 2026-01-24
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://defygravitycampaign.utoronto.ca/

Founded in 1827, the University of Toronto is Canada’s top university with a long history of challenging the impossible and transforming society through the ingenuity and resolve of our faculty, students, alumni, and supporters. We are proud to be one of the world’s top research-intensive universities, bringing together top minds from every conceivable background and discipline to collaborate on the world’s most pressing challenges. As a catalyst for discovery, innovation, and progress, we prepare our students for success through an outstanding global education and commitment to inclusive excellence. The ideas, innovations, and actions of more than 660,000 graduates advance U of T’s impact on communities across the globe.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 28,634
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

RMIT University

124 La Trobe St, Melbourne, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849
http://www.rmit.edu.au

RMIT is a global university of technology, design and enterprise. One of Australia's original tertiary institutions, RMIT University enjoys an international reputation for excellence in professional and vocational education, applied research, and engagement with the needs of industry and the community. RMIT is a world leader in Art and Design; Architecture and the Built Environment; Engineering; Accounting and Finance; and Business and Management Studies. CRICOS provider code: 00122A

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 14,132
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-toronto.jpeg
University of Toronto
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rmit-university.jpeg
RMIT University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Toronto
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RMIT University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Toronto in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RMIT University in 2026.

Incident History — University of Toronto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Toronto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RMIT University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RMIT University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-toronto.jpeg
University of Toronto
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rmit-university.jpeg
RMIT University
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Toronto company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RMIT University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RMIT University company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to University of Toronto company.

In the current year, RMIT University company and University of Toronto company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RMIT University company nor University of Toronto company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RMIT University company nor University of Toronto company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RMIT University company nor University of Toronto company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Toronto company nor RMIT University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Toronto nor RMIT University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Toronto company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to RMIT University company.

University of Toronto company employs more people globally than RMIT University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Toronto nor RMIT University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Toronto nor RMIT University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Toronto nor RMIT University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Toronto nor RMIT University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Toronto nor RMIT University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Toronto nor RMIT University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References