Comparison Overview

University of Southern California

VS

Georgia Institute of Technology

University of Southern California

3551 Trousdale Parkway, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90089
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

The University of Southern California is a leading private research university located in Los Angeles, the capital of the Pacific Rim. This is the official LinkedIn presence for the University of Southern California. This account is managed and mediated by the staff of USC University Communications. Content (including posts from 3rd parties) that include videos, photographs, opinions and links to content outside of this channel do not necessarily represent the University of Southern California’s academic goals or opinions. Community guidelines: Alumni and students are welcome to post professional updates and news. Posts containing solicitations, product placements, derogatory or inflammatory comments are prohibited and will be removed. Off-topic comments will also be removed. Posts are not regularly monitored. Please note: for questions regarding degrees offered and admissions policies please call (213) 740-2311.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 23,757
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Georgia Institute of Technology

225 North Ave, Atlanta, Georgia , 30332-0530, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849

The Georgia Institute of Technology is one of the nation's premier research universities providing a focused, technologically based education to more than 25,000 undergraduate and graduate students . Ranked seventh among U.S. News & World Report's top public universities, Georgia Tech offers degrees through the Colleges of Business, Computing, Design, Engineering, Liberal Arts and Sciences. The Institute offers research opportunities to both undergraduate and graduate students and is home to more than 100 centers that consistently contribute vital innovation to American government, industry, and business.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 19,134
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-southern-california.jpeg
University of Southern California
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgia-institute-of-technology.jpeg
Georgia Institute of Technology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Southern California
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Georgia Institute of Technology
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Southern California in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Georgia Institute of Technology in 2026.

Incident History — University of Southern California (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Southern California cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Georgia Institute of Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Georgia Institute of Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-southern-california.jpeg
University of Southern California
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Loss of External Hard Drive
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/georgia-institute-of-technology.jpeg
Georgia Institute of Technology
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Georgia Institute of Technology company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Southern California company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Southern California company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Georgia Institute of Technology company has not reported any.

In the current year, Georgia Institute of Technology company and University of Southern California company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Georgia Institute of Technology company nor University of Southern California company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

University of Southern California company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Georgia Institute of Technology company has not reported such incidents publicly.

University of Southern California company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Georgia Institute of Technology company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of Southern California company nor Georgia Institute of Technology company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Southern California nor Georgia Institute of Technology holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Southern California company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Georgia Institute of Technology company.

University of Southern California company employs more people globally than Georgia Institute of Technology company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Southern California nor Georgia Institute of Technology holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Southern California nor Georgia Institute of Technology holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Southern California nor Georgia Institute of Technology holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Southern California nor Georgia Institute of Technology holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Southern California nor Georgia Institute of Technology holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Southern California nor Georgia Institute of Technology holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H