Comparison Overview

University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association

VS

Michigan Giving

University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association

1110 N. Dakota St., None, Vermillion, SD, US, 57069
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

The mission of the University of South Dakota Foundation is to inspire investment in the University of South Dakota by promoting a culture of leadership, empowerment, and accountability. Our team members are passionate about servant leadership, innovation, and collaboration. We are constantly striving to improve ourselves in an effort to better support the University of South Dakota. The Foundation has built a strong professional staff, its success lies with the dedicated support of alumni and friends of USD and the many volunteers who have served as officers, trustees, and members of the board along with visionary leaders of the University itself. The future holds even more promise as USD, in partnership with the Foundation, continues to raise its prominence as one of the nation’s highest quality comprehensive state universities.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Michigan Giving

undefined, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, US
Last Update: 2025-12-19
Between 750 and 799

At the University of Michigan, philanthropy drives progress. Our donors help students achieve their dreams, fund pioneering research, support equity and inclusion, and so much more. This wide-reaching impact is what Michigan Giving is all about. Follow us to explore job opportunities, keep up with the latest gift announcements, and discover how philanthropy is spurring meaningful change at Michigan—and how you can be a part of it.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-south-dakota-foundation.jpeg
University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-michigan-development-community.jpeg
Michigan Giving
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Michigan Giving
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Michigan Giving in 2025.

Incident History — University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Michigan Giving (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Michigan Giving cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-south-dakota-foundation.jpeg
University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-michigan-development-community.jpeg
Michigan Giving
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking, Encryption Cracking, Unauthorized Access
Motivation: Unauthorized access to personal information
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Michigan Giving company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Michigan Giving company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association company.

In the current year, Michigan Giving company has reported more cyber incidents than University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association company.

Neither Michigan Giving company nor University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Michigan Giving company and University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Michigan Giving company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association company nor Michigan Giving company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association nor Michigan Giving holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Michigan Giving company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association company.

University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association company employs more people globally than Michigan Giving company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association nor Michigan Giving holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association nor Michigan Giving holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association nor Michigan Giving holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association nor Michigan Giving holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association nor Michigan Giving holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of South Dakota Foundation and Alumni Association nor Michigan Giving holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N