Comparison Overview

University of South Carolina

VS

RMIT University

University of South Carolina

Columbia, SC, US, 29208
Last Update: 2026-01-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://sc.edu

With thriving academic and research excellence and a lively, welcoming student experience, the University of South Carolina brings the opportunities of higher education to new generations. South Carolina's unrivaled college experience has been sought by students, faculty and academic researchers for more than 200 years. Founded in 1801, the university is located in Columbia, the capital of South Carolina. The University of South Carolina System, led by President Michael Amiridis who is serving as the university's 30th president, and has eight campuses in 20 locations that together serve more than 54,000 students.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 12,918
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

RMIT University

124 La Trobe St, Melbourne, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849
http://www.rmit.edu.au

RMIT is a global university of technology, design and enterprise. One of Australia's original tertiary institutions, RMIT University enjoys an international reputation for excellence in professional and vocational education, applied research, and engagement with the needs of industry and the community. RMIT is a world leader in Art and Design; Architecture and the Built Environment; Engineering; Accounting and Finance; and Business and Management Studies. CRICOS provider code: 00122A

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 14,132
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uofsc.jpeg
University of South Carolina
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rmit-university.jpeg
RMIT University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of South Carolina
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RMIT University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of South Carolina in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RMIT University in 2026.

Incident History — University of South Carolina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of South Carolina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RMIT University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RMIT University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uofsc.jpeg
University of South Carolina
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rmit-university.jpeg
RMIT University
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RMIT University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of South Carolina company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RMIT University company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to University of South Carolina company.

In the current year, RMIT University company and University of South Carolina company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RMIT University company nor University of South Carolina company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RMIT University company nor University of South Carolina company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RMIT University company nor University of South Carolina company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of South Carolina company nor RMIT University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of South Carolina nor RMIT University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

RMIT University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of South Carolina company.

RMIT University company employs more people globally than University of South Carolina company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of South Carolina nor RMIT University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of South Carolina nor RMIT University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of South Carolina nor RMIT University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of South Carolina nor RMIT University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of South Carolina nor RMIT University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of South Carolina nor RMIT University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References