Comparison Overview

University of South Carolina

VS

Auburn University

University of South Carolina

undefined, Columbia, SC, 29208, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://sc.edu

With thriving academic and research excellence and a lively, welcoming student experience, the University of South Carolina brings the opportunities of higher education to new generations. South Carolina's unrivaled college experience has been sought by students, faculty and academic researchers for more than 200 years. Founded in 1801, the university is located in Columbia, the capital of South Carolina. The University of South Carolina System, led by President Michael Amiridis who is serving as the university's 30th president, and has eight campuses in 20 locations that together serve more than 54,000 students.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 12,423
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Auburn University

23 Samford Hall, Auburn, AL, US, 36849
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799
http://www.auburn.edu

Auburn University is a comprehensive land, space and sea grant research institution blending arts and applied sciences. The university continuously changes to accommodate today's needs, while still respecting the traditions and spirit of Auburn. As we grow and change, Auburn will always continue its tradition of excellence. The main campus had an enrollment during fall of 2017 of 29,776. Auburn University offers degrees in 15 schools and colleges at the undergraduate, graduate and professional levels. Auburn University is known not only for its academic excellence, but also for its impact on Alabama as well. A recent study determined Auburn had a nearly $4 billion economic impact on the state of Alabama, including a $1.5 billion impact on the economy and a $2.4 billion impact in "human capital."​ Auburn's Technical Assistance Center, a collaborative engineering and business outreach unit, performs hundreds of projects annually for state industry, generating millions of dollars in increased efficiencies and saving or creating hundreds of jobs statewide.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,289
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-south-carolina.jpeg
University of South Carolina
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/auburn-university.jpeg
Auburn University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of South Carolina
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Auburn University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of South Carolina in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Auburn University in 2026.

Incident History — University of South Carolina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of South Carolina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Auburn University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Auburn University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-south-carolina.jpeg
University of South Carolina
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/auburn-university.jpeg
Auburn University
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2015
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

University of South Carolina company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Auburn University company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Auburn University company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of South Carolina company has not reported any.

In the current year, Auburn University company and University of South Carolina company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Auburn University company nor University of South Carolina company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Auburn University company nor University of South Carolina company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Auburn University company nor University of South Carolina company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of South Carolina company nor Auburn University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of South Carolina nor Auburn University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of South Carolina company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Auburn University company.

University of South Carolina company employs more people globally than Auburn University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of South Carolina nor Auburn University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of South Carolina nor Auburn University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of South Carolina nor Auburn University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of South Carolina nor Auburn University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of South Carolina nor Auburn University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of South Carolina nor Auburn University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References