Comparison Overview

University of Pittsburgh

VS

Washington State University

University of Pittsburgh

4200 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, US, 15260
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.pitt.edu/pittwire

The University of Pittsburgh is a top-ranked, public institution in Pennsylvania and a member of the Association of American Universities of leading research universities. With our discoveries, we are recognized as one of the most innovative universities in the world. We invent the paths of the future and forge ahead. Pitt is a member of the Association of American Universities (AAU), which comprises 62 preeminent doctorate-granting research institutions in North America.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 19,281
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Washington State University

Pullman/Spokane/Tri-Cities/Vancouver/Everett/Global, Pullman/Spokane/Tri-Cities/Vancouver/Everett/Global, Washington, 99164, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
https://wsu.edu

Washington State University is a nationally recognized land-grant research university, founded in Pullman in 1890. WSU’s statewide system includes campuses in Pullman, Spokane, Everett, Tri-Cities and Vancouver, with extension and research offices in every county of the state, and a nationally ranked online program. WSU is well known for its programs in veterinary medicine, agriculture, engineering, architecture, global animal health, food science, plant science, business, human health, pharmacy, neuroscience, communications, biofuels, sleep, business, education, energy. And, WSU athletics teams compete in the NCAA’s Pac-12 Conference.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,227
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-pittsburgh.jpeg
University of Pittsburgh
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-state-university.jpeg
Washington State University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Pittsburgh
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Washington State University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Pittsburgh in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washington State University in 2026.

Incident History — University of Pittsburgh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Pittsburgh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Washington State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washington State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-pittsburgh.jpeg
University of Pittsburgh
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Email
Motivation: Accidental
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-state-university.jpeg
Washington State University
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Washington State University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Pittsburgh company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Pittsburgh company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Washington State University company has not reported any.

In the current year, Washington State University company and University of Pittsburgh company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Washington State University company nor University of Pittsburgh company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Washington State University company nor University of Pittsburgh company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Washington State University company nor University of Pittsburgh company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Pittsburgh company nor Washington State University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Pittsburgh nor Washington State University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Pittsburgh company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Washington State University company.

University of Pittsburgh company employs more people globally than Washington State University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Pittsburgh nor Washington State University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Pittsburgh nor Washington State University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Pittsburgh nor Washington State University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Pittsburgh nor Washington State University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Pittsburgh nor Washington State University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Pittsburgh nor Washington State University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References