Comparison Overview

Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System

VS

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System

3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, US, 19104
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pennmedicine.org

Penn Medicine’s mission is to advance knowledge and improve health through research, patient care, and the education of trainees in an inclusive culture that embraces diversity, fosters innovation, stimulates critical thinking, supports lifelong learning, and sustains our legacy of excellence. Penn Medicine includes six acute-care hospitals and hundreds of outpatient centers throughout the region. Our hospitals include The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Pennsylvania Hospital, Chester County Hospital, Lancaster General Health and Penn Medicine Princeton Health. Penn Medicine has been named #6 on Forbes Magazine’s annual “Best Employers in America” list ranking large employers across the nation, up from #7 in 2017. Penn Medicine has also been named #2 on Forbes Magazine's first-ever "Best Employers for Women"​ list in 2018. Honors include #1 in the Region and top Health Care employer. Stay connected at: https://www.pennmedicine.org/news

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 21,151
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

1 Johnson and Johnson Plaza, New Brunswick, New Jersey, US, 08901
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://thenext.jnjmedtech.com

At Johnson & Johnson MedTech, we are working to solve the world’s most pressing healthcare challenges through innovations at the intersection of biology and technology. With deep expertise in surgery, orthopaedics, cardiovascular, and vision, we design healthcare solutions that are smarter, less invasive and more personalized. We are developing the next generation of med tech solutions to tackle the most pervasive and complex health challenges for people around the world.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 34,798
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-pennsylvania-health-system.jpeg
Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-&-johnson-medtech.jpeg
Johnson & Johnson MedTech
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Johnson & Johnson MedTech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson & Johnson MedTech in 2025.

Incident History — Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Johnson & Johnson MedTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson & Johnson MedTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-pennsylvania-health-system.jpeg
Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/johnson-&-johnson-medtech.jpeg
Johnson & Johnson MedTech
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Johnson & Johnson MedTech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Johnson & Johnson MedTech company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System company.

In the current year, Johnson & Johnson MedTech company and Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech company nor Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech company nor Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Johnson & Johnson MedTech company nor Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System company nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Johnson & Johnson MedTech company.

Johnson & Johnson MedTech company employs more people globally than Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Health System nor Johnson & Johnson MedTech holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References