Comparison Overview

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

VS

Washington University in St. Louis

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

103 South Building, CB 9100, Chapel Hill, NC, US, 27514
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

Carolina’s vibrant people and programs attest to the University’s long-standing place among leaders in higher education since it was chartered in 1789 and opened its doors for students in 1795 as the nation’s first public university. Situated in the beautiful college town of Chapel Hill, N.C., UNC has earned a reputation as one of the best universities in the world. Carolina prides itself on a strong, diverse student body, academic opportunities not found anywhere else, and a value unmatched by any public university in the nation. UNC-Chapel Hill's LinkedIn comments guidelines: Thank you for liking the LinkedIn page of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. This page highlights information about the people and programs at Carolina. Consistent with UNC-Chapel Hill’s Policy on Prohibited Discrimination, Harassment and Related Misconduct, and the North Carolina Campus Free Speech Act, we encourage your comments and opinions as they relate to our posts. This page is actively monitored for relevance. Carolina reserves the right to remove any comments that are not related to the particular post, make unsupported accusations, contain ad-hominem attacks, use obscene language or images, are blatant spam, contain advertisements, or contain inappropriate personal information or sensitive information. Repeated violation of these guidelines or behavior that substantially disrupts the maintenance of this page could result in a user being blocked from the page. Thanks for keeping the page enjoyable for everyone. Go Tar Heels!

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 20,123
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Washington University in St. Louis

One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, mo, US, 63130-4899
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Washington University in St. Louis, a medium-sized, independent university, is dedicated to challenging its faculty and students alike to seek new knowledge and greater understanding of an ever-changing, multicultural world. The university has played an integral role in the history and continuing growth of St. Louis and benefits in turn from the wide array of social, cultural and recreational opportunities offered by the metropolitan area to its more than 2.8 million residents. The mission of Washington University in St. Louis is the promotion of learning — learning by students and by faculty. Teaching, the transmission of knowledge, is central to our mission, as is research, the creation of new knowledge.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 17,820
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-north-carolina-at-chapel-hill.jpeg
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-university-in-st-louis.jpeg
Washington University in St. Louis
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Washington University in St. Louis
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Washington University in St. Louis in 2026.

Incident History — The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Washington University in St. Louis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Washington University in St. Louis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-north-carolina-at-chapel-hill.jpeg
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Phishing Email
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2017
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/washington-university-in-st-louis.jpeg
Washington University in St. Louis
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Washington University in St. Louis company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Washington University in St. Louis company has not reported any.

In the current year, Washington University in St. Louis company and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Washington University in St. Louis company nor The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Washington University in St. Louis company nor The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Washington University in St. Louis company nor The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill company nor Washington University in St. Louis company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill nor Washington University in St. Louis holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Washington University in St. Louis company.

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill company employs more people globally than Washington University in St. Louis company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill nor Washington University in St. Louis holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill nor Washington University in St. Louis holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill nor Washington University in St. Louis holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill nor Washington University in St. Louis holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill nor Washington University in St. Louis holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill nor Washington University in St. Louis holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.