Comparison Overview

University of Nebraska System

VS

University of Maryland

University of Nebraska System

3835 Holdrege St, None, Lincoln, Nebraska, US, 68583
Last Update: 2025-12-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nebraska.edu

This is the official LinkedIn page of the the University of Nebraska System, the state of Nebraska's only public university. The NU System is comprised of four campuses: the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, the University of Nebraska at Omaha, the University of Nebraska Medical Center, and the University of Nebraska at Kearney. A land-grant flagship campus. An academic medical center. A metropolitan campus serving our urban citizens. And a campus focused on undergraduates. Collectively, these four unique institutions are known as the University of Nebraska System. Each institution has distinct strengths, giving the University of Nebraska System a scope of expertise that is hard to equal. Side by side, we accomplish more—for our state and for our world. Visit us at www.nebraska.edu or follow us on Twitter at @U_Nebraska to learn more. -------------------- COMMUNITY GUIDELINES: When posting to this page, please adhere to the Official University Social Media Community Guidelines, which can be read here: http://bit.ly/NU-community-guidelines

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 22,831
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

University of Maryland

University of Maryland, College Park, MD, US, 20742
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://umd.edu

As the State's flagship, the University of Maryland (UMD) strives to bring students deeply into the process of discovery, innovation and entrepreneurship. Whenever possible, hands-on research complements classroom instruction. Interdisciplinary collaborations facilitate the understanding of complex problems like cybersecurity and climate change, and international study and diversity help our graduates become global citizens. Its location inside Washington, D.C.'s Beltway, along with its own Metro stop, gives students numerous opportunities to work with neighboring federal agencies and labs, think tanks and foreign organizations.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 21,026
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-nebraska.jpeg
University of Nebraska System
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-maryland.jpeg
University of Maryland
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Nebraska System
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Maryland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Nebraska System in 2025.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Maryland in 2025.

Incident History — University of Nebraska System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Nebraska System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Maryland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Maryland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-nebraska.jpeg
University of Nebraska System
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-maryland.jpeg
University of Maryland
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

University of Nebraska System company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Maryland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Maryland company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Nebraska System company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of Maryland company and University of Nebraska System company have not reported any cyber incidents.

University of Maryland company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while University of Nebraska System company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of Maryland company nor University of Nebraska System company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Maryland company nor University of Nebraska System company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Nebraska System company nor University of Maryland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Nebraska System nor University of Maryland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither University of Nebraska System company nor University of Maryland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

University of Nebraska System company employs more people globally than University of Maryland company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Nebraska System nor University of Maryland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Nebraska System nor University of Maryland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Nebraska System nor University of Maryland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Nebraska System nor University of Maryland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Nebraska System nor University of Maryland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Nebraska System nor University of Maryland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References