Comparison Overview

University of Mississippi Foundation

VS

Buffalo Fundraising Consultants

University of Mississippi Foundation

Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

The University of Mississippi Foundation is a nonprofit corporation chartered in 1973 by the State of Mississippi to operate primarily for the benefit of the University of Mississippi. The Foundation is responsible for receiving, receipting, investing and distributing all gifts for the benefit of the University of Mississippi. It pursues this mission in an environment of productive teamwork, effective communication, and relentless service to our donors, University administrators, faculty, staff and students. Communication of University needs and priorities along with encouraging investment in the future of Ole Miss are integral to our success. Integrity, honor, civility, service and respect for our donors and their wishes serve as the Foundation's guiding principles.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Buffalo Fundraising Consultants

Suite 2B Whitefriars, Bristol, undefined, BS1 2NT, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Buffalo Fundraising Consultants Ltd specialise in regular giving programmes. Since 2004, Buffalo has helped accelerate the development programmes of hundreds of institutions. We deliver bespoke, regular giving services: direct debit processing, data validation and enrichment, mailings that capture up-to-date contact details, giving days, telethons and more. We know that regular giving programmes can be transformational, and Buffalo prides itself on enhancing and extending the capabilities of all our clients. We ensure that only a package of necessary services is proposed, based on our clients’ experience and available resources. We are proud to be known as an innovative company that regularly develops new solutions for problems our clients encounter, whilst at the same time constantly seeking ways to improve the services we already offer. We have helped raise millions of pounds for the not-for-profit sector, which includes education, arts and general charity.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-mississippi-foundation.jpeg
University of Mississippi Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buffalo-fundraising-consultants.jpeg
Buffalo Fundraising Consultants
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Mississippi Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Buffalo Fundraising Consultants
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Mississippi Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Buffalo Fundraising Consultants in 2025.

Incident History — University of Mississippi Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Mississippi Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Buffalo Fundraising Consultants (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Buffalo Fundraising Consultants cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-mississippi-foundation.jpeg
University of Mississippi Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buffalo-fundraising-consultants.jpeg
Buffalo Fundraising Consultants
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Buffalo Fundraising Consultants company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Mississippi Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Buffalo Fundraising Consultants company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to University of Mississippi Foundation company.

In the current year, Buffalo Fundraising Consultants company and University of Mississippi Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Buffalo Fundraising Consultants company nor University of Mississippi Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Buffalo Fundraising Consultants company nor University of Mississippi Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Buffalo Fundraising Consultants company nor University of Mississippi Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Mississippi Foundation company nor Buffalo Fundraising Consultants company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Mississippi Foundation nor Buffalo Fundraising Consultants holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither University of Mississippi Foundation company nor Buffalo Fundraising Consultants company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Buffalo Fundraising Consultants company employs more people globally than University of Mississippi Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither University of Mississippi Foundation nor Buffalo Fundraising Consultants holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Mississippi Foundation nor Buffalo Fundraising Consultants holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Mississippi Foundation nor Buffalo Fundraising Consultants holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Mississippi Foundation nor Buffalo Fundraising Consultants holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Mississippi Foundation nor Buffalo Fundraising Consultants holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Mississippi Foundation nor Buffalo Fundraising Consultants holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N