Comparison Overview

University of Minnesota

VS

University of Waterloo

University of Minnesota

East and West Bank and St. Paul campus, Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota, US
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 750 and 799

One of the nation’s largest schools, the University of Minnesota offers baccalaureate, master’s, and doctoral degrees in virtually every field—from medicine to business, law to liberal arts, and science and engineering to architecture. The University of Minnesota system is made up of five campuses in Minnesota including Crookston, Duluth, Morris, Rochester, and the Twin Cities (Minneapolis/St. Paul). University of Minnesota Extension provides outreach and education services to Minnesota's communities through science-based knowledge, expertise and training. The University of Minnesota was recognized by Forbes in 2018 in the Best Employer, Best Employer for Diversity, and Best Employer for New Grads categories.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 27,883
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

University of Waterloo

200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, CA, N2L 3G1
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 800 and 849

University of Waterloo is a leader in innovation that drives economic and social prosperity for Canada and the world. We are home to a renowned talent pipeline, game-changing research and technology, and unmatched entrepreneurial culture, that together create solutions to tackle today’s and tomorrow’s challenges. Our greatest impact happens together. A strategic integration of research and teaching excellence, the world’s largest co-operative education program, entrepreneurship-intensive programs, and creator-owned IP, has resulted in extensive industry collaboration, the generation of thousands of commercial and social enterprises, and a dynamic learning experience for more than 41,000 undergraduate and graduate students.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 11,421
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-minnesota.jpeg
University of Minnesota
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uwaterloo.jpeg
University of Waterloo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Minnesota
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Waterloo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Minnesota in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Waterloo in 2026.

Incident History — University of Minnesota (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Minnesota cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Waterloo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Waterloo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-minnesota.jpeg
University of Minnesota
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uwaterloo.jpeg
University of Waterloo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Waterloo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Minnesota company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Minnesota company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Waterloo company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of Waterloo company and University of Minnesota company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Waterloo company nor University of Minnesota company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

University of Minnesota company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other University of Waterloo company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of Waterloo company nor University of Minnesota company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Minnesota company nor University of Waterloo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Minnesota nor University of Waterloo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Waterloo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Minnesota company.

University of Minnesota company employs more people globally than University of Waterloo company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Minnesota nor University of Waterloo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Minnesota nor University of Waterloo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Minnesota nor University of Waterloo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Minnesota nor University of Waterloo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Minnesota nor University of Waterloo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Minnesota nor University of Waterloo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.