Comparison Overview

University of Michigan

VS

The California State University

University of Michigan

1109 Geddes Ave, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48104, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://umich.edu/

The mission of the University of Michigan is to serve the people of Michigan and the world through preeminence in creating, communicating, preserving, and applying knowledge, art, and academic values, and in developing leaders and citizens who will challenge the present and enrich the future. Why Work at Michigan? Being part of something greater, of serving a larger mission of discovery and care — that's the heart of what drives people to work at Michigan. In some way, great or small, every person here helps to advance this world-class institution. It's adding a purpose to your profession. Work at Michigan and become a victor for the greater good.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 37,146
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

The California State University

401 Golden Shore, Long Beach, CA, US, 90802
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 800 and 849
https://www.calstate.edu/

The California State University is the largest system of four-year higher education in the country, with 22 campuses, 56,000 faculty and staff and more than 450,000 students. Created in 1960, the mission of the CSU is to provide high-quality, affordable education to meet the ever-changing needs of California. With its commitment to quality, opportunity, and student success, the CSU is renowned for superb teaching, innovative research and for producing job-ready graduates. The CSU powers California and the nation, sending nearly 127,000 career-ready graduates into the workforce each year. In fact, one in every 20 Americans holding a college degree earned it at the CSU and our alumni are 4 million strong.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 92,037
Subsidiaries: 40
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-michigan.jpeg
University of Michigan
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-california-state-university.jpeg
The California State University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Michigan
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The California State University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Michigan in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The California State University in 2026.

Incident History — University of Michigan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Michigan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The California State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The California State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-michigan.jpeg
University of Michigan
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking, Encryption Cracking, Unauthorized Access
Motivation: Unauthorized access to personal information
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-california-state-university.jpeg
The California State University
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2013
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

The California State University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Michigan company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Michigan and The California State University have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, The California State University company and University of Michigan company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The California State University company nor University of Michigan company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both The California State University company and University of Michigan company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

University of Michigan company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while The California State University company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither University of Michigan company nor The California State University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Michigan nor The California State University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The California State University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Michigan company.

The California State University company employs more people globally than University of Michigan company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Michigan nor The California State University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Michigan nor The California State University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Michigan nor The California State University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Michigan nor The California State University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Michigan nor The California State University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Michigan nor The California State University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References