Comparison Overview

University of Maryland

VS

Emory University

University of Maryland

University of Maryland, College Park, MD, US, 20742
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://umd.edu

As the State's flagship, the University of Maryland (UMD) strives to bring students deeply into the process of discovery, innovation and entrepreneurship. Whenever possible, hands-on research complements classroom instruction. Interdisciplinary collaborations facilitate the understanding of complex problems like cybersecurity and climate change, and international study and diversity help our graduates become global citizens. Its location inside Washington, D.C.'s Beltway, along with its own Metro stop, gives students numerous opportunities to work with neighboring federal agencies and labs, think tanks and foreign organizations.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 21,312
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Emory University

408 Administration Building, 201 Dowman Drive, Atlanta, GA, US, 30322
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
https://http://emory.edu

Emory University, a top research university located in Atlanta, Georgia, is an inquiry-driven, ethically engaged and diverse community whose members work collaboratively for positive transformation in the world through courageous leadership in teaching, research, scholarship, health care and social action. The university is recognized internationally for its outstanding liberal arts college, superb professional schools and one of the Southeast's leading health care systems.

NAICS: 6113
NAICS Definition: Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees: 15,447
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-maryland.jpeg
University of Maryland
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emory-university.jpeg
Emory University
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
University of Maryland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Emory University
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Maryland in 2026.

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Emory University in 2026.

Incident History — University of Maryland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Maryland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Emory University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Emory University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/university-of-maryland.jpeg
University of Maryland
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/emory-university.jpeg
Emory University
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Emory University company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to University of Maryland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

University of Maryland company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Emory University company has not reported any.

In the current year, Emory University company and University of Maryland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

University of Maryland company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Emory University company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Emory University company nor University of Maryland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Emory University company nor University of Maryland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither University of Maryland company nor Emory University company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither University of Maryland nor Emory University holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Emory University company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to University of Maryland company.

University of Maryland company employs more people globally than Emory University company, reflecting its scale as a Higher Education.

Neither University of Maryland nor Emory University holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither University of Maryland nor Emory University holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither University of Maryland nor Emory University holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither University of Maryland nor Emory University holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither University of Maryland nor Emory University holds HIPAA certification.

Neither University of Maryland nor Emory University holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References